2020
Current Treatment of Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Study
NAVRÁTIL, Ondřej, Kamil ĎURIŠ, Vilém JURÁŇ, Karel SVOBODA, Jakub HUSTÝ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Current Treatment of Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: Single Center Study
Autoři
NAVRÁTIL, Ondřej (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Kamil ĎURIŠ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Vilém JURÁŇ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Karel SVOBODA (203 Česká republika), Jakub HUSTÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Evžen HOVORKA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Eduard NEUMAN (203 Česká republika, domácí), Andrej MRLIAN (703 Slovensko, domácí) a Martin SMRČKA (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
Brain Sciences, ST ALBAN-ANLAGE, MDPI, 2020, 2076-3425
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30103 Neurosciences
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.394
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00116430
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000564572000001
Klíčová slova anglicky
intracranial aneurysms; subarachnoid hemorrhage; anterior communicating artery; outcome; treatment
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 1. 2021 10:31, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction: Anterior communicating artery aneurysms (ACoAAs) are the most frequent intracranial aneurysms treated at neurosurgical departments with a vascular program. Material and methods: We reviewed patients with ACoAAs in a single institution over ten years (2008-2017). The focus was on the final outcome; complications, age, and clinical condition with respect to modalities were analyzed. Results: A total of 198 patients treated during this period was included in the study: 176 patients had a ruptured ACoAA and 22 had an unruptured ACoAA. Then, 127 (71%) were treated surgically and 51 (29%) by endovascular means. Out of the whole series, a good recovery occurred in 123 patients (62%), moderate disability in 11 (5.5%), severe disability in 19 (10%), vegetative state in 11 (5.5%), and death in 34 (17%). In the 157 patients (72.5%) with a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), both modalities had a favorable outcome: 27.5% had an unfavorable outcome, 12% had complications in surgery versus 17.6% during endovascular treatment. No statistical difference in outcome, complications, and age was noted between modalities. Surgical treatment was more frequently adopted for patients in a better clinical condition (p <= 0.05). Conclusion: More than two thirds of the patients (72.5%) reached a favorable outcome. There was no difference in age between the treatment modalities. Risks of complications are present and specific for both modalities.