Eustress and Distress: Neither Good Nor Bad, but Rather the
Same?

J 2020

Eustress and Distress: Neither Good Nor Bad, but Rather the Same?

DOBROVOLNÁ, Julie, Peter LENÁRT a Martin SCHERINGER

Základní údaje

Originální název

Eustress and Distress: Neither Good Nor Bad, but Rather the Same?

Autoři

DOBROVOLNÁ, Julie (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Peter LENÁRT (703 Slovensko, domácí) a Martin SCHERINGER (756 Švýcarsko, domácí)

Vydání

BioEssays, Hoboken, Wiley, 2020, 0265-9247

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10602 Biology , Evolutionary biology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.345

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/20:00116454

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900238

UT WoS

000526143200001

Klíčová slova anglicky

disease; environment; eustress; health; preconditioning; stress

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 9. 11. 2020 18:12, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

The terms "eustress" and "distress" are widely used throughout the scientific literature. As of February 2020, 203 items in the Web of Science show up in a search for "eustress," however, there are almost 16 400 items found in a search for the term "distress." Based on the reasoning in this article, however, it is believed there is no such thing as eustress or distress. The adaptation reaction of an organism under stress is not intrinsically good or bad, and its effect on health or performance depends on a plethora of other interactions of the body with the environment as well as on the history of such interactions. The vagueness of the terms "eustress/distress" has historically led to vast differences in the perception and application of the terms across disciplines. While psychology or sociology perceive eustress as something inextricably linked to positive perception and enhanced cognition, biomedicine perceives eustress as generally associated with better survival, health, or increased longevity, no matter how the event is perceived. In this paper, the authors review the current understanding of the term "eustress" in different fields, discuss possible implications of its misleading use, and suggest that the term may be replaced by "stress" only.

Návaznosti

EF15_003/0000469, projekt VaV

Název: Cetocoen Plus

EF16_013/0001761, projekt VaV

Název: RECETOX RI

LM2015051, projekt VaV

Název: Centrum pro výzkum toxických látek v prostředí (Akronym: RECETOX RI)

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Výzkumná infrastruktura RECETOX

Citovat

DOBROVOLNÁ, Julie, Peter LENÁRT a Martin SCHERINGER. Eustress and Distress: Neither Good Nor Bad, but Rather the Same? BioEssays. Hoboken: Wiley, 2020, roč. 42, č. 7, s. 1-5. ISSN 0265-9247. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900238.

@article{1679676,
   author = {Dobrovolná, Julie and Lenárt, Peter and Scheringer, Martin},
   article_location = {Hoboken},
   article_number = {7},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900238},
   keywords = {disease; environment; eustress; health; preconditioning; stress},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0265-9247},
   journal = {BioEssays},
   title = {Eustress and Distress: Neither Good Nor Bad, but Rather the Same?},
   url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bies.201900238},
   volume = {42},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1679676
AU  - Dobrovolná, Julie - Lenárt, Peter - Scheringer, Martin
PY  - 2020
TI  - Eustress and Distress: Neither Good Nor Bad, but Rather the Same?
JF  - BioEssays
VL  - 42
IS  - 7
SP  - 1-5
EP  - 1-5
PB  - Wiley
SN  - 02659247
KW  - disease
KW  - environment
KW  - eustress
KW  - health
KW  - preconditioning
KW  - stress
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bies.201900238
L2  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bies.201900238
N2  - The terms "eustress" and "distress" are widely used throughout the scientific literature. As of February 2020, 203 items in the Web of Science show up in a search for "eustress," however, there are almost 16 400 items found in a search for the term "distress." Based on the reasoning in this article, however, it is believed there is no such thing as eustress or distress. The adaptation reaction of an organism under stress is not intrinsically good or bad, and its effect on health or performance depends on a plethora of other interactions of the body with the environment as well as on the history of such interactions. The vagueness of the terms "eustress/distress" has historically led to vast differences in the perception and application of the terms across disciplines. While psychology or sociology perceive eustress as something inextricably linked to positive perception and enhanced cognition, biomedicine perceives eustress as generally associated with better survival, health, or increased longevity, no matter how the event is perceived. In this paper, the authors review the current understanding of the term "eustress" in different fields, discuss possible implications of its misleading use, and suggest that the term may be replaced by "stress" only.
ER  -

DOBROVOLNÁ, Julie, Peter LENÁRT a Martin SCHERINGER. Eustress and Distress: Neither Good Nor Bad, but Rather the Same? \textit{BioEssays}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2020, roč.~42, č.~7, s.~1-5. ISSN~0265-9247. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201900238.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci