2020
The Effect of Diabetes on Prognosis Following Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Angioplasty and Potent Antiplatelet Therapy
SIMEK, Stanislav, Zuzana MOŤOVSKÁ, Ota HLINOMAZ, Petr KALA, Milan HROMADKA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
The Effect of Diabetes on Prognosis Following Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Angioplasty and Potent Antiplatelet Therapy
Autoři
SIMEK, Stanislav (203 Česká republika), Zuzana MOŤOVSKÁ (703 Slovensko, garant), Ota HLINOMAZ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Petr KALA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Milan HROMADKA (203 Česká republika), Jiri KNOT (203 Česká republika), Ivo VARVAROVSKY (203 Česká republika), Jaroslav DUSEK (203 Česká republika), Richard ROKYTA (203 Česká republika), Frantisek TOUSEK (203 Česká republika), Michal SVOBODA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Alexandra VODZINSKA (203 Česká republika), Jan MROZEK (203 Česká republika) a Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Journal of Clinical Medicine, BASEL, MDPI, 2020, 2077-0383
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30218 General and internal medicine
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.241
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00116476
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000567080400001
Klíčová slova anglicky
acute myocardial infarction; primary percutaneous coronary intervention; diabetes mellitus; prognosis; antiplatelets; prasugrel; ticagrelor; clopidogrel
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 21. 9. 2023 10:58, Mgr. Michal Petr
Anotace
V originále
Purpose: To investigate the prognostic significance of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients with high risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in the era of potent antithrombotics. Methods: Data from 1230 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients enrolled in the PRAGUE-18 (prasugrel vs. ticagrelor in pPCI) study were analyzed. Ischemic and bleeding event rates were calculated for patients with and without diabetes. The independent impact of diabetes on outcomes was evaluated after adjustment for outcome predictors. Results: The prevalence of DMwas 20% (N = 250). Diabetics were older and more often female. They were more likely to have hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, multivessel coronary disease and left main disease, and be obese. The primary net-clinical endpoint (EP) containing death, spontaneous nonfatal MI, stroke, severe bleeding, and revascularization at day 7 occurred in 6.1% of patients with, and in 3.5% of patients without DM (HR 1.8; 95% CI 0.978-3.315; p = 0.055). At one year, the key secondary endpoint defined as cardiovascular death, spontaneous MI, or stroke occurred in 8.8% with, and 5.5% withoutDM(HR 1.621; 95% CI 0.987-2.661; p = 0.054). In those with DM the risk of total one-year mortality (6.8% vs. 3.9% (HR 1.773; 95% CI 1.001-3.141; p = 0.047)) and the risk of nonfatal reinfarction (4.8% vs. 2.2% (HR 2.177; 95% CI 1.077-4.398; p = 0.026)) were significantly higher compared to in those without DM. There was no risk of major bleeding associated with DM (HR 0.861; 95% CI 0.554-1.339; p = 0.506). In the multivariate analysis, diabetes was independently associated with the one-year risk of reinfarction (HR 2.176; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.055-4.489; p = 0.035). Conclusion: Despite best practices STEMI treatment, diabetes is still associated with significantly worse prognoses, which highlights the importance of further improvements in the management of this high-risk population.