J 2021

The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring

BEDNÁŘ, Daniel, Petr OTÁHAL, Ladislav NĚMEČEK and Eva GERŠLOVÁ

Basic information

Original name

The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring

Name in Czech

Analytický přístup použití dronu v radiačním monitorování

Authors

BEDNÁŘ, Daniel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Petr OTÁHAL (203 Czech Republic), Ladislav NĚMEČEK and Eva GERŠLOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Radioprotection, EDP Sciences, 2021, 0033-8451

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Článek v odborném periodiku

Field of Study

10511 Environmental sciences

Country of publisher

France

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

References:

Impact factor

Impact factor: 1.589

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14310/21:00120714

Organization unit

Faculty of Science

UT WoS

000626691500009

Keywords (in Czech)

radiace; monitorování; dron; letecké měření; PPDE

Keywords in English

radiation; monitoring; drone; aerial measurement; ADER

Tags

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/4/2021 10:18, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.

Abstract

V originále

During the traditional way of radiation field monitoring - walking measurements – is possible to encounter inaccessible or dangerous areas. For this case, the National Institute for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Protection (SUJCHBO) has created the method of aerial measurement of ambient dose equivalent rate (ADER) using the drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer. This paper presents two methods on estimation of near-surface gamma radiation based on aerial measurements with Drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer D230A. The D230A was first tested in a room fitted with walls with a higher amount of natural radionuclides from uranium series. The aerial measurements were done at SUJCHBO’s Heliport at three altitudes (6, 11 and 16 m) and from the obtained data, the values of ADER for the altitude of 1 m were calculated and compared with the data measured in the altitude of 1 m. From the two proposed methods, the first one serves for evaluation of the whole measured area while the second method serves for evaluation of zones of interest. In the case of the first method, the highest difference between the calculated and measured data for the altitude of 1 m was 20% and, in case of the second method, the difference of -13.3% and -8.2% was achieved.