Detailed Information on Publication Record
2021
The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring
BEDNÁŘ, Daniel, Petr OTÁHAL, Ladislav NĚMEČEK and Eva GERŠLOVÁBasic information
Original name
The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring
Name in Czech
Analytický přístup použití dronu v radiačním monitorování
Authors
BEDNÁŘ, Daniel (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution), Petr OTÁHAL (203 Czech Republic), Ladislav NĚMEČEK and Eva GERŠLOVÁ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution)
Edition
Radioprotection, EDP Sciences, 2021, 0033-8451
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10511 Environmental sciences
Country of publisher
France
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.589
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14310/21:00120714
Organization unit
Faculty of Science
UT WoS
000626691500009
Keywords (in Czech)
radiace; monitorování; dron; letecké měření; PPDE
Keywords in English
radiation; monitoring; drone; aerial measurement; ADER
Tags
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Změněno: 20/4/2021 10:18, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Abstract
V originále
During the traditional way of radiation field monitoring - walking measurements – is possible to encounter inaccessible or dangerous areas. For this case, the National Institute for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Protection (SUJCHBO) has created the method of aerial measurement of ambient dose equivalent rate (ADER) using the drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer. This paper presents two methods on estimation of near-surface gamma radiation based on aerial measurements with Drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer D230A. The D230A was first tested in a room fitted with walls with a higher amount of natural radionuclides from uranium series. The aerial measurements were done at SUJCHBO’s Heliport at three altitudes (6, 11 and 16 m) and from the obtained data, the values of ADER for the altitude of 1 m were calculated and compared with the data measured in the altitude of 1 m. From the two proposed methods, the first one serves for evaluation of the whole measured area while the second method serves for evaluation of zones of interest. In the case of the first method, the highest difference between the calculated and measured data for the altitude of 1 m was 20% and, in case of the second method, the difference of -13.3% and -8.2% was achieved.