Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1680659,
author = {Bednář, Daniel and Otáhal, Petr and Němeček, Ladislav and Geršlová, Eva},
article_number = {1},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020066},
keywords = {radiation; monitoring; drone; aerial measurement; ADER},
language = {eng},
issn = {0033-8451},
journal = {Radioprotection},
title = {The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring},
url = {https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/abs/first/radiopro200037/radiopro200037.html},
volume = {56},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1680659
AU - Bednář, Daniel - Otáhal, Petr - Němeček, Ladislav - Geršlová, Eva
PY - 2021
TI - The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring
JF - Radioprotection
VL - 56
IS - 1
SP - 61-67
EP - 61-67
PB - EDP Sciences
SN - 00338451
KW - radiation
KW - monitoring
KW - drone
KW - aerial measurement
KW - ADER
UR - https://www.radioprotection.org/articles/radiopro/abs/first/radiopro200037/radiopro200037.html
N2 - During the traditional way of radiation field monitoring - walking measurements – is possible to encounter inaccessible or dangerous areas. For this case, the National Institute for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Protection (SUJCHBO) has created the method of aerial measurement of ambient dose equivalent rate (ADER) using the drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer. This paper presents two methods on estimation of near-surface gamma radiation based on aerial measurements with Drone equipped with gamma-spectrometer D230A. The D230A was first tested in a room fitted with walls with a higher amount of natural radionuclides from uranium series. The aerial measurements were done at SUJCHBO’s Heliport at three altitudes (6, 11 and 16 m) and from the obtained data, the values of ADER for the altitude of 1 m were calculated and compared with the data measured in the altitude of 1 m. From the two proposed methods, the first one serves for evaluation of the whole measured area while the second method serves for evaluation of zones of interest. In the case of the first method, the highest difference between the calculated and measured data for the altitude of 1 m was 20% and, in case of the second method, the difference of -13.3% and -8.2% was achieved.
ER -
BEDNÁŘ, Daniel, Petr OTÁHAL, Ladislav NĚMEČEK and Eva GERŠLOVÁ. The analytical approach of Drone use in radiation monitoring. \textit{Radioprotection}. EDP Sciences, 2021, vol.~56, No~1, p.~61-67. ISSN~0033-8451. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020066.
|
