Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1680837, author = {Bohlin, Sara Pernilla and Melymuk, Lisa Emily and White, Kevin Bradley and Kalina, Jiří and Madadi, Vincent O. and AduandKumi, Sam and Prokeš, Roman and Přibylová, Petra and Klánová, Jana}, article_location = {OXFORD (ENGLAND)}, article_number = {October 2020}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117742}, keywords = {Passive air sampling; Polyurethane foam; Sampling rates; Persistent organic pollutants; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons}, language = {eng}, issn = {1352-2310}, journal = {Atmospheric Environment}, title = {Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135223102030474X?via%3Dihub}, volume = {238}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1680837 AU - Bohlin, Sara Pernilla - Melymuk, Lisa Emily - White, Kevin Bradley - Kalina, Jiří - Madadi, Vincent O. - Adu-Kumi, Sam - Prokeš, Roman - Přibylová, Petra - Klánová, Jana PY - 2020 TI - Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance JF - Atmospheric Environment VL - 238 IS - October 2020 SP - 1-10 EP - 1-10 PB - Pergamon Press SN - 13522310 KW - Passive air sampling KW - Polyurethane foam KW - Sampling rates KW - Persistent organic pollutants KW - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135223102030474X?via%3Dihub L2 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135223102030474X?via%3Dihub N2 - Polyurethane foam (PUF) passive air samplers (PAS) are widely used for measurements of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and other semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in large-scale monitoring networks as well as in case studies around the globe. Calibration of PUF-PAS is performed by field-based calibration studies or passive sampler uptake models. Both are typically performed and/or validated in temperate zones, however the sampling rates are more widely applied, including in tropical and polar zones. Here, we present field-based calibration results for MONET PUF-PAS from a subtropical and tropical site (Nairobi, Kenya and Accra, Ghana) based on side-by-side deployment of PUF-PAS and active air samplers (AAS), as well as model PAS uptake from available passive sampler uptake models. By comparing these results with a similar calibration from a temperate site (Brno, Czech Republic), we show that higher ambient temperatures result in higher effective sampling rates for intermediate molecular weight SVOCs (logK(OA) of 7-11) as a result of lower particle-bound fractions, and in lower sample volumes for lighter SVOCs (logK(OA)<7) as a result of a shorter time to equilibrium. This highlights the importance of adjusting passive sampling rates according to site-specific air temperatures. Model-based calibrations provided sampling volumes in agreement with the field-based calibration except for high K-OA compounds, but the source of the discrepancy appears to be the model parameterization of the specific PUF-PAS sampler type rather than temperature-induced differences. Overall, the results suggest that while careful consideration should be taken when extrapolating calibration information from temperate to tropical zones, field or model-based calibrations are appropriate, and greater attention should be given to ensuring passive sampler models are correctly parameterized for the sampling configuration used. ER -
BOHLIN, Sara Pernilla, Lisa Emily MELYMUK, Kevin Bradley WHITE, Jiří KALINA, Vincent O. MADADI, Sam ADU-KUMI, Roman PROKEŠ, Petra PŘIBYLOVÁ a Jana KLÁNOVÁ. Field- and model-based calibration of polyurethane foam passive air samplers in different climate regions highlights differences in sampler uptake performance. \textit{Atmospheric Environment}. OXFORD (ENGLAND): Pergamon Press, 2020, roč.~238, October 2020, s.~1-10. ISSN~1352-2310. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117742.
|