C 2020

Peer Review in Czech Education: A Recognized but Somewhat Neglected Tool for School Development

MICHEK, Stanislav, Martin CHVÁL a Milan POL

Základní údaje

Originální název

Peer Review in Czech Education: A Recognized but Somewhat Neglected Tool for School Development

Autoři

MICHEK, Stanislav (203 Česká republika), Martin CHVÁL (203 Česká republika) a Milan POL (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Cham, School peer review for educational improvement and accountability : theory, practice and policy implications, od s. 139-156, 18 s. Accountability and Educational Improvement, 2020

Nakladatel

Springer

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Stát vydavatele

Německo

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/20:00116633

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

ISBN

978-3-030-48129-2

Klíčová slova anglicky

School peer review; school improvement; school data use; Czech Republic

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 12. 5. 2021 13:56, Mgr. Igor Hlaváč

Anotace

V originále

This chapter presents the practice of peer review as related to self-evaluation processes in Czech schools. It begins with a description of changes that have occurred in self-evaluation of Czech schools during the last 15 years. This is followed by discussion of efforts to support peer review in the last hundred years and a description of how peer review was supported in the Road to Quality, a nation-wide project (2009–2012) that approached peer review as evaluation by teams from other schools. Experience from the project is presented along with research methods applied, such as questionnaire survey, semi-structured interview, document analysis, participated observation, inquiry and case study. The findings give evidence on (a) expectations of schools willing to carry out peer review; (b) evaluation activities and work with school data; (c) differences between peer review and action of Czech School Inspectorate; (d) willingness of schools to continue using peer review for further development. In conclusion, peer review in the Czech Republic is perceived as a potentially promising activity; in terms of practice, however, it is shown that it remains somewhat peripheral in the mainstream of Czech schools.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1047/2019, interní kód MU
Název: Učení v různých kontextech
Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Učení v různých kontextech, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty