2020
Peer Review in Czech Education: A Recognized but Somewhat Neglected Tool for School Development
MICHEK, Stanislav, Martin CHVÁL a Milan POLZákladní údaje
Originální název
Peer Review in Czech Education: A Recognized but Somewhat Neglected Tool for School Development
Autoři
MICHEK, Stanislav (203 Česká republika), Martin CHVÁL (203 Česká republika) a Milan POL (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
Cham, School peer review for educational improvement and accountability : theory, practice and policy implications, od s. 139-156, 18 s. Accountability and Educational Improvement, 2020
Nakladatel
Springer
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/20:00116633
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
ISBN
978-3-030-48129-2
Klíčová slova anglicky
School peer review; school improvement; school data use; Czech Republic
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 12. 5. 2021 13:56, Mgr. Igor Hlaváč
Anotace
V originále
This chapter presents the practice of peer review as related to self-evaluation processes in Czech schools. It begins with a description of changes that have occurred in self-evaluation of Czech schools during the last 15 years. This is followed by discussion of efforts to support peer review in the last hundred years and a description of how peer review was supported in the Road to Quality, a nation-wide project (2009–2012) that approached peer review as evaluation by teams from other schools. Experience from the project is presented along with research methods applied, such as questionnaire survey, semi-structured interview, document analysis, participated observation, inquiry and case study. The findings give evidence on (a) expectations of schools willing to carry out peer review; (b) evaluation activities and work with school data; (c) differences between peer review and action of Czech School Inspectorate; (d) willingness of schools to continue using peer review for further development. In conclusion, peer review in the Czech Republic is perceived as a potentially promising activity; in terms of practice, however, it is shown that it remains somewhat peripheral in the mainstream of Czech schools.
Návaznosti
MUNI/A/1047/2019, interní kód MU |
|