1.1). Results Survival analysis showed median OS of 23
months for erlotinib, 29.3 months for afatinib, 19.6 months for
gefitinib, 12.2 months for pemetrexed, 17.5 months for
pemetrexed maintenance, 15.8 months for bevacizumab and 15.8
months for bevacizumab maintenance. Calculated IREs for OS for
the regimens were: erlotinib 1.013, afatinib 1.184, gefitinib
0.736, pemetrexed 1.188, pemetrexed maintenance 1.294,
bevacizumab 1.178, and bevacizumab maintenance 1.189.
Multivariate regression analysis showed that these factors were
associated with longer OS: lower PS for afatinib; lower PS,
absence of adverse events and female sex for bevacizumab; and
lower PS and female sex for pemetrexed. Conclusions This study
clearly demonstrated that real-life effectiveness of certain
treatment regimens may strongly differ in various
populations/health care systems, and comparison between TULUNG
data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher
real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line
regimens. Lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse
events were associated with longer survival in most regimens.
Key pointsSignificant findings of the study Comparison between
TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher
real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line
regimens; for most regimens, lower ECOG PS, younger age, female
sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival.
What this study adds Real-life effectiveness of certain
treatment regimens may strongly differ in various
populations/health care systems.">
Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stageIIIB/IV NSCLCpatients: Data from theCzechTULUNG Registry
Autoři
BRAT, Kristián (703 Slovensko, domácí), Monika BRATOVÁ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Jana SKŘIČKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Magda BAŘINOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Karolína HURDÁLKOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Milos PESEK (203 Česká republika), Libor HAVEL (203 Česká republika), Leona KOUBKOVA (203 Česká republika), Michal HRNCIARIK (203 Česká republika), Jana KREJCI (203 Česká republika), Ondrej FISCHER (203 Česká republika), Milada ZEMANOVA (203 Česká republika), Helena COUPKOVA (203 Česká republika) a Martin SVATON (203 Česká republika)
Background Data regarding real-life effectiveness of any treatment may improve clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-life effectiveness of tyrosin-kinase inhibitors, bevacizumab and pemetrexed as first-line treatments in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We analyzed data of 2157 patients of the Czech TULUNG Registry of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who received modern-era treatments between 2011 and 2018. Patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, bevacizumab (+ maintenance), pemetrexed (+ maintenance) as first-line therapy were included in the study. A systematic literature search separately identified clinical trials suitable for calculation of comparator pooled OS and PFS for each regimen. For each subgroup, basic characteristics and survival data (Kaplan-Meier estimates) are shown. We propose the "index of real-life effectiveness" (IRE), a ratio of real-life OS/PFS and comparator pooled OS/PFS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified factors were associated with longer OS (ie, IRE>1.1). Results Survival analysis showed median OS of 23 months for erlotinib, 29.3 months for afatinib, 19.6 months for gefitinib, 12.2 months for pemetrexed, 17.5 months for pemetrexed maintenance, 15.8 months for bevacizumab and 15.8 months for bevacizumab maintenance. Calculated IREs for OS for the regimens were: erlotinib 1.013, afatinib 1.184, gefitinib 0.736, pemetrexed 1.188, pemetrexed maintenance 1.294, bevacizumab 1.178, and bevacizumab maintenance 1.189. Multivariate regression analysis showed that these factors were associated with longer OS: lower PS for afatinib; lower PS, absence of adverse events and female sex for bevacizumab; and lower PS and female sex for pemetrexed. Conclusions This study clearly demonstrated that real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems, and comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens. Lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival in most regimens. Key pointsSignificant findings of the study Comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens; for most regimens, lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival. What this study adds Real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems.
BRAT, Kristián, Monika BRATOVÁ, Jana SKŘIČKOVÁ, Magda BAŘINOVÁ, Karolína HURDÁLKOVÁ, Milos PESEK, Libor HAVEL, Leona KOUBKOVA, Michal HRNCIARIK, Jana KREJCI, Ondrej FISCHER, Milada ZEMANOVA, Helena COUPKOVA a Martin SVATON. Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stageIIIB/IV NSCLCpatients: Data from theCzechTULUNG Registry. THORACIC CANCER. HOBOKEN: WILEY, 2020, roč. 11, č. 11, s. 3346-3356. ISSN 1759-7706. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13679.
@article{1686540, author = {Brat, Kristián and Bratová, Monika and Skřičková, Jana and Bařinová, Magda and Hurdálková, Karolína and Pesek, Milos and Havel, Libor and Koubkova, Leona and Hrnciarik, Michal and Krejci, Jana and Fischer, Ondrej and Zemanova, Milada and Coupkova, Helena and Svaton, Martin}, article_location = {HOBOKEN}, article_number = {11}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13679}, keywords = {Anticancer treatment; non-small cell lung cancer; progression-free survival; real-life effectiveness; tyrosinkinase inhibitors}, language = {eng}, issn = {1759-7706}, journal = {THORACIC CANCER}, title = {Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stageIIIB/IV NSCLCpatients: Data from theCzechTULUNG Registry}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1759-7714.13679}, volume = {11}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1686540 AU - Brat, Kristián - Bratová, Monika - Skřičková, Jana - Bařinová, Magda - Hurdálková, Karolína - Pesek, Milos - Havel, Libor - Koubkova, Leona - Hrnciarik, Michal - Krejci, Jana - Fischer, Ondrej - Zemanova, Milada - Coupkova, Helena - Svaton, Martin PY - 2020 TI - Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stageIIIB/IV NSCLCpatients: Data from theCzechTULUNG Registry JF - THORACIC CANCER VL - 11 IS - 11 SP - 3346-3356 EP - 3346-3356 PB - WILEY SN - 17597706 KW - Anticancer treatment KW - non-small cell lung cancer KW - progression-free survival KW - real-life effectiveness KW - tyrosinkinase inhibitors UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1759-7714.13679 L2 - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1759-7714.13679 N2 - Background Data regarding real-life effectiveness of any treatment may improve clinical decision-making. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-life effectiveness of tyrosin-kinase inhibitors, bevacizumab and pemetrexed as first-line treatments in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We analyzed data of 2157 patients of the Czech TULUNG Registry of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who received modern-era treatments between 2011 and 2018. Patients treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, bevacizumab (+ maintenance), pemetrexed (+ maintenance) as first-line therapy were included in the study. A systematic literature search separately identified clinical trials suitable for calculation of comparator pooled OS and PFS for each regimen. For each subgroup, basic characteristics and survival data (Kaplan-Meier estimates) are shown. We propose the "index of real-life effectiveness" (IRE), a ratio of real-life OS/PFS and comparator pooled OS/PFS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified factors were associated with longer OS (ie, IRE>1.1). Results Survival analysis showed median OS of 23 months for erlotinib, 29.3 months for afatinib, 19.6 months for gefitinib, 12.2 months for pemetrexed, 17.5 months for pemetrexed maintenance, 15.8 months for bevacizumab and 15.8 months for bevacizumab maintenance. Calculated IREs for OS for the regimens were: erlotinib 1.013, afatinib 1.184, gefitinib 0.736, pemetrexed 1.188, pemetrexed maintenance 1.294, bevacizumab 1.178, and bevacizumab maintenance 1.189. Multivariate regression analysis showed that these factors were associated with longer OS: lower PS for afatinib; lower PS, absence of adverse events and female sex for bevacizumab; and lower PS and female sex for pemetrexed. Conclusions This study clearly demonstrated that real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems, and comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens. Lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival in most regimens. Key pointsSignificant findings of the study Comparison between TULUNG data and pooled survival data from trials showed higher real-life effectiveness for most of the studied first-line regimens; for most regimens, lower ECOG PS, younger age, female sex and adverse events were associated with longer survival. What this study adds Real-life effectiveness of certain treatment regimens may strongly differ in various populations/health care systems. ER -
BRAT, Kristián, Monika BRATOVÁ, Jana SKŘIČKOVÁ, Magda BAŘINOVÁ, Karolína HURDÁLKOVÁ, Milos PESEK, Libor HAVEL, Leona KOUBKOVA, Michal HRNCIARIK, Jana KREJCI, Ondrej FISCHER, Milada ZEMANOVA, Helena COUPKOVA a Martin SVATON. Real-life effectiveness of first-line anticancer treatments in stageIIIB/IV NSCLCpatients: Data from theCzechTULUNG Registry. \textit{THORACIC CANCER}. HOBOKEN: WILEY, 2020, roč.~11, č.~11, s.~3346-3356. ISSN~1759-7706. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13679.