2020
Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?
MORARU, Madalina Bianca a Galina CORNELISSEZákladní údaje
Originální název
Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?
Autoři
MORARU, Madalina Bianca (642 Rumunsko, garant, domácí) a Galina CORNELISSE
Vydání
1 edition. UK, Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, od s. 17-41, 25 s. Modern Studies in European Law, 2020
Nakladatel
Hart
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50501 Law
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14220/20:00116753
Organizační jednotka
Právnická fakulta
ISBN
978-1-5099-2295-6
Klíčová slova anglicky
Return Directive; judicial interaction; EU law; CJEU; ECHR
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 29. 10. 2020 14:03, Mgr. Petra Georgala
Anotace
V originále
This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.