C 2020

Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?

MORARU, Madalina Bianca a Galina CORNELISSE

Základní údaje

Originální název

Introduction: Judicial Dialogue on the Return Directive – Catalyst for Changing Migration Governance?

Autoři

MORARU, Madalina Bianca (642 Rumunsko, garant, domácí) a Galina CORNELISSE

Vydání

1 edition. UK, Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union, od s. 17-41, 25 s. Modern Studies in European Law, 2020

Nakladatel

Hart

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/20:00116753

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

ISBN

978-1-5099-2295-6

Klíčová slova anglicky

Return Directive; judicial interaction; EU law; CJEU; ECHR

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 29. 10. 2020 14:03, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

This volume examines the implementation of the Return Directive from the perspective of judicial dialogue. While the role of judges has been widely addressed in European asylum law and EU law more generally, their role in EU return policy has hitherto remained under explored. This volume addresses the interaction and dialogue between domestic judiciaries and European courts in the implementation of European return policy. The book brings together leading authors from various backgrounds, including legal scholars, judges and practitioners. This allows the collection to offer theoretical and practical perspectives on important questions regarding the regulation of irregular migration in Europe, such as: what constitutes inadequate implementation of the Directive and under which conditions can judicial dialogue solve it? How can judges ensure that the right balance is struck between effective return procedures and fundamental rights? Why do we see different patterns of judicial dialogue in the Member States when it comes to particular questions of return policy, for example regarding the use of detention? These questions are more timely than ever given the shifting public discourse on immigration and the growing political backlash against immigration courts. This book will be essential reading for all scholars and practitioners in the fields of immigration law and policy, EU law and public law.