2021
Energy poverty in the Czech Republic : Individual responsibility or structural issue?
KOĎOUSKOVÁ, Hedvika a Lukáš LEHOTSKÝZákladní údaje
Originální název
Energy poverty in the Czech Republic : Individual responsibility or structural issue?
Autoři
Vydání
Energy Research & Social Science, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 2021, 2214-6296
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele
Nizozemské království
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 8.514
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/21:00120846
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Energy poverty; Policy framing; Bureaucracy; The Czech Republic
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 6. 2021 09:19, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
Anotace
V originále
Although energy poverty is now high on the EU agenda, pressing member states to adopt targeted policies, there are considerable differences in the state of play across individual countries. In this context, it is worth investigating how this agenda translates into policy. We aim to contribute to this underrepresented strand of research in the energy poverty domain by focusing on the discursive side. This paper starts with the theoretical assumption that bureaucrats are especially important in the initial stages of new policy formation. It further presupposes framing as a process that typically occurs in tackling the complex reality of an emerging policy problem. We have chosen the Czech Republic as a case study as it does not currently have any official energy poverty policies though a working group on the ministerial level has been tasked to define the issue in the Czech context. The research reveals how relevant Czech bureaucrats frame the question of energy poverty. We identify three distinctive frames. Whereas two frames follow the broader ideological debate on poverty (individualizing vs. structural view), the third builds on the concept of vulnerability. None of the frames is clearly predominant. Besides their conflicting views about the causes of energy poverty, responsibilities and policies, there are also disagreements over the appropriate level (national or regional) of governance and a widely held belief that external research actors should shed more light on the issue. The complexity of the discussion may complicate finding a common approach.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/1044/2019, interní kód MU |
|