2020
The Influence of the Relative Age Effect in the Czech Youth Ice Hockey League
AGRICOLA, Andrián, Michal BOZDĚCH a Jiří ZHÁNĚLZákladní údaje
Originální název
The Influence of the Relative Age Effect in the Czech Youth Ice Hockey League
Autoři
AGRICOLA, Andrián (703 Slovensko, garant), Michal BOZDĚCH (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jiří ZHÁNĚL (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
Montenegrin journal of sports science and medicine, 2020, 1800-8755
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50900 5.9 Other social sciences
Stát vydavatele
Černá Hora
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14510/20:00117779
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sportovních studií
UT WoS
000567071400004
Klíčová slova anglicky
birth date; ice hockey; talent; productivity; chronological age
Štítky
Změněno: 30. 4. 2021 13:58, Mgr. Pavlína Roučová, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
The issue of Relative Age Effect (RAE) focuses on the causes and consequences of the failure to respect development patterns of individuals in relation to their success, especially in sports. This study aims to determine whether the influence of the RAE can be proven in the Czech youth ice hockey league (U15) (n=744). A Chi-Square test (x2) has shown that the influence in the whole investigated group cannot be rejected (x2=25.34, p<0.01, w=0.11). The RAE can be rejected in the group of players (n=78) from the three best teams of the competition (x2=3.09, p=0.38, w=0.11); the influence of the RAE can also be rejected in players (n=75) from the three worst teams (x2=0.53, p=0.91, w=0.05). The assessment of RAE on playing positions has shown that the RAE can be rejected (x2=7.31, p=0.06, w=0.22) in the most productive forwards (n=50) as well as in the least productive forwards (n=50) (x2=0.48, p=0.92, w=0.06). The RAE is rejected in the group of the most productive defensemen (n=50) (x2=1.71, p=0.11, w=0.11), and in the group of the least productive defensemen (n=50) (x2=4.15, p=0.25, w=0.17). The RAE cannot be rejected (x2=8.88, p=0.03, w=0.35) in the group of best goaltenders (n=24); the RAE is rejected in the group of the worst goaltenders (n=24) (x2=1.5, p=0.68, w=0.14). Although the results have proven that the RAE cannot be rejected in the entire research group, there is no evidence of its influence (with the exception of the best goaltenders) in individual playing positions.