Benchmarking of additive manufacturing technologies for
commerciallypure-titanium bone-tissue-engineering scaffolds:
processing-microstructureproperty relationship

J 2020

Benchmarking of additive manufacturing technologies for commerciallypure-titanium bone-tissue-engineering scaffolds: processing-microstructureproperty relationship

MONTUFAR, E. B., S. TKACHENKO, M. CASAS-LUNA, Pavel SKARVADA, Karel SLAMECKA et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Benchmarking of additive manufacturing technologies for commerciallypure-titanium bone-tissue-engineering scaffolds: processing-microstructureproperty relationship

Autoři

MONTUFAR, E. B. (garant), S. TKACHENKO, M. CASAS-LUNA, Pavel SKARVADA (203 Česká republika), Karel SLAMECKA (203 Česká republika), S. DIAZ-DE-LA-TORRE, Daniel KOUTNY (203 Česká republika), David PALOUSEK (203 Česká republika), Zuzana KOLEDOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí), L. HERNANDEZ-TAPIA, Tomas ZIKMUND (203 Česká republika), Ladislav CELKO (203 Česká republika) a J. KAISER

Vydání

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, AMSTERDAM, ELSEVIER, 2020, 2214-8604

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

21100 2.11 Other engineering and technologies

Stát vydavatele

Nizozemské království

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 10.998

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/20:00117940

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101516

UT WoS

000600807800102

Klíčová slova anglicky

Robocasting; Selective laser melting; Pressure-less spark plasma sintering; Titanium; Bone scaffold

Štítky

14110517, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 6. 5. 2021 13:04, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

This work provides the benchmarking of two additive manufacturing (AM) technologies suitable for the fabrication of commercially pure titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, i.e., selective laser melting (SLM) and robocasting. SLM is a powder bed fusion technique that is industrially used for the AM of titanium parts, whereas robocasting is an extrusion technique mainly studied for the fabrication of ceramic scaffolds that requires post-sintering for the consolidation. A novelty of this work is to combine robocasting with pressure-less spark plasma sintering (PL-SPS) for the fabrication and fast consolidation of titanium scaffolds. The results show that the metallurgical phenomena occurring in both techniques are different. Melting and fast solidification in SLM produced martensitic-like microstructure of titanium with low microporosity (6 %). In contrast, solid-state sintering in robocasting resulted in the equiaxed grain microstructure of alpha titanium phase with 13 % of microporosity. The mechanical performance of the scaffolds was determined by the microporosity of the rods rather than microstructure. Consequently, robocasting resulted in lower compressive yield strength and effective elastic modulus than SLM, which were in the range of human trabecular bone. Finally, both AM technologies produced cytocompatible scaffolds that showed evidence of in vitro osteogenic activity.

Návaznosti

ROZV/28/LF19/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Regulace morfogeneze epitelu mléčné žlázy pomocí mechanických sil a dynamiky signalizace

Investor: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy ČR, Regulace morfogeneze epitelu mléčné žlázy pomocí mechanických sil a dynamiky signalizace, Interní rozvojové projekty

90110, velká výzkumná infrastruktura

Název: CzechNanoLab

Citovat

MONTUFAR, E. B., S. TKACHENKO, M. CASAS-LUNA, Pavel SKARVADA, Karel SLAMECKA, S. DIAZ-DE-LA-TORRE, Daniel KOUTNY, David PALOUSEK, Zuzana KOLEDOVÁ, L. HERNANDEZ-TAPIA, Tomas ZIKMUND, Ladislav CELKO a J. KAISER. Benchmarking of additive manufacturing technologies for commerciallypure-titanium bone-tissue-engineering scaffolds: processing-microstructureproperty relationship. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING. AMSTERDAM: ELSEVIER, 2020, roč. 36, DEC 2020, s. 1-13. ISSN 2214-8604. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101516.

@article{1731469,
   author = {Montufar, E. B. and Tkachenko, S. and CasasandLuna, M. and Skarvada, Pavel and Slamecka, Karel and DiazanddeandlaandTorre, S. and Koutny, Daniel and Palousek, David and Koledová, Zuzana and HernandezandTapia, L. and Zikmund, Tomas and Celko, Ladislav and Kaiser, J.},
   article_location = {AMSTERDAM},
   article_number = {DEC 2020},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101516},
   keywords = {Robocasting; Selective laser melting; Pressure-less spark plasma sintering; Titanium; Bone scaffold},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2214-8604},
   journal = {ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING},
   title = {Benchmarking of additive manufacturing technologies for commerciallypure-titanium bone-tissue-engineering scaffolds: processing-microstructureproperty relationship},
   url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860420308885?via%3Dihub},
   volume = {36},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1731469
AU  - Montufar, E. B. - Tkachenko, S. - Casas-Luna, M. - Skarvada, Pavel - Slamecka, Karel - Diaz-de-la-Torre, S. - Koutny, Daniel - Palousek, David - Koledová, Zuzana - Hernandez-Tapia, L. - Zikmund, Tomas - Celko, Ladislav - Kaiser, J.
PY  - 2020
TI  - Benchmarking of additive manufacturing technologies for commerciallypure-titanium bone-tissue-engineering scaffolds: processing-microstructureproperty relationship
JF  - ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
VL  - 36
IS  - DEC 2020
SP  - 1-13
EP  - 1-13
PB  - ELSEVIER
SN  - 22148604
KW  - Robocasting
KW  - Selective laser melting
KW  - Pressure-less spark plasma sintering
KW  - Titanium
KW  - Bone scaffold
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860420308885?via%3Dihub
L2  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214860420308885?via%3Dihub
N2  - This work provides the benchmarking of two additive manufacturing (AM) technologies suitable for the fabrication of commercially pure titanium scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, i.e., selective laser melting (SLM) and robocasting. SLM is a powder bed fusion technique that is industrially used for the AM of titanium parts, whereas robocasting is an extrusion technique mainly studied for the fabrication of ceramic scaffolds that requires post-sintering for the consolidation. A novelty of this work is to combine robocasting with pressure-less spark plasma sintering (PL-SPS) for the fabrication and fast consolidation of titanium scaffolds. The results show that the metallurgical phenomena occurring in both techniques are different. Melting and fast solidification in SLM produced martensitic-like microstructure of titanium with low microporosity (6 %). In contrast, solid-state sintering in robocasting resulted in the equiaxed grain microstructure of alpha titanium phase with 13 % of microporosity. The mechanical performance of the scaffolds was determined by the microporosity of the rods rather than microstructure. Consequently, robocasting resulted in lower compressive yield strength and effective elastic modulus than SLM, which were in the range of human trabecular bone. Finally, both AM technologies produced cytocompatible scaffolds that showed evidence of in vitro osteogenic activity.
ER  -

MONTUFAR, E. B., S. TKACHENKO, M. CASAS-LUNA, Pavel SKARVADA, Karel SLAMECKA, S. DIAZ-DE-LA-TORRE, Daniel KOUTNY, David PALOUSEK, Zuzana KOLEDOVÁ, L. HERNANDEZ-TAPIA, Tomas ZIKMUND, Ladislav CELKO a J. KAISER. Benchmarking of additive manufacturing technologies for commerciallypure-titanium bone-tissue-engineering scaffolds: processing-microstructureproperty relationship. \textit{ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING}. AMSTERDAM: ELSEVIER, 2020, roč.~36, DEC 2020, s.~1-13. ISSN~2214-8604. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101516.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci