Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production

J 2021

Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production

VÍTĚZ, Tomáš, Jakub ELBL, Petr TRÁVNÍČEK, Eliška KOBZOVÁ, Tereza HAMMERSCHMIEDT et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production

Autoři

VÍTĚZ, Tomáš (garant), Jakub ELBL, Petr TRÁVNÍČEK, Eliška KOBZOVÁ, Tereza HAMMERSCHMIEDT, Tomáš KOUTNÝ, Antonin KINTL a Monika VÍTĚZOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

BioEnergy Research, New York, Springer, 2021, 1939-1234

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10606 Microbiology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.852

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/21:00121002

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0

UT WoS

000554441500001

Klíčová slova anglicky

Biomass; Maize silage; Shredlage; Nutrient composition; Biomethanation

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 29. 3. 2021 15:27, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.

Anotace

V originále

Many farms run livestock production along with a biogas plant. Priority is the effort to prepare high-quality feed and high-quality feedstock for the biogas plant. However, deciding which harvesting technique to choose seems a difficult task. In this study, the influence of harvest technique on silage quality and thus on the methane yield during anaerobic digestion was investigated. Maize was harvested for silage and shredlage production. Two-year results showed that the chemical composition of water leachate from silage and the total solids content did not indicate any significant differences between maize silage and shredlage. Methane yield in the first year ranged from 0.2735 +/- 0.0095 m(3)/kg(VS)(maize silage) to 0.3024 +/- 0.0090 m(3)/kg(VS)(shredlage) and in the second year from 0.3047 +/- 0.0110 m(3)/kg(VS)(maize silage) to 0.3147 +/- 0.0086 m(3)/kg(VS)(shredlage). Methane concentration in biogas did not show any significant differences for the two types of harvesting techniques in both years. The results showed that harvest technique had no additional effect on the methane content in biogas and thus on the methane yield.

Citovat

VÍTĚZ, Tomáš, Jakub ELBL, Petr TRÁVNÍČEK, Eliška KOBZOVÁ, Tereza HAMMERSCHMIEDT, Tomáš KOUTNÝ, Antonin KINTL a Monika VÍTĚZOVÁ. Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production. BioEnergy Research. New York: Springer, 2021, roč. 14, č. 1, s. 303-312. ISSN 1939-1234. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0.

@article{1731516,
   author = {Vítěz, Tomáš and Elbl, Jakub and Trávníček, Petr and Kobzová, Eliška and Hammerschmiedt, Tereza and Koutný, Tomáš and Kintl, Antonin and Vítězová, Monika},
   article_location = {New York},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0},
   keywords = {Biomass; Maize silage; Shredlage; Nutrient composition; Biomethanation},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1939-1234},
   journal = {BioEnergy Research},
   title = {Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production},
   url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0},
   volume = {14},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1731516
AU  - Vítěz, Tomáš - Elbl, Jakub - Trávníček, Petr - Kobzová, Eliška - Hammerschmiedt, Tereza - Koutný, Tomáš - Kintl, Antonin - Vítězová, Monika
PY  - 2021
TI  - Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production
JF  - BioEnergy Research
VL  - 14
IS  - 1
SP  - 303-312
EP  - 303-312
PB  - Springer
SN  - 19391234
KW  - Biomass
KW  - Maize silage
KW  - Shredlage
KW  - Nutrient composition
KW  - Biomethanation
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0
L2  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0
N2  - Many farms run livestock production along with a biogas plant. Priority is the effort to prepare high-quality feed and high-quality feedstock for the biogas plant. However, deciding which harvesting technique to choose seems a difficult task. In this study, the influence of harvest technique on silage quality and thus on the methane yield during anaerobic digestion was investigated. Maize was harvested for silage and shredlage production. Two-year results showed that the chemical composition of water leachate from silage and the total solids content did not indicate any significant differences between maize silage and shredlage. Methane yield in the first year ranged from 0.2735 +/- 0.0095 m(3)/kg(VS)(maize silage) to 0.3024 +/- 0.0090 m(3)/kg(VS)(shredlage) and in the second year from 0.3047 +/- 0.0110 m(3)/kg(VS)(maize silage) to 0.3147 +/- 0.0086 m(3)/kg(VS)(shredlage). Methane concentration in biogas did not show any significant differences for the two types of harvesting techniques in both years. The results showed that harvest technique had no additional effect on the methane content in biogas and thus on the methane yield.
ER  -

VÍTĚZ, Tomáš, Jakub ELBL, Petr TRÁVNÍČEK, Eliška KOBZOVÁ, Tereza HAMMERSCHMIEDT, Tomáš KOUTNÝ, Antonin KINTL a Monika VÍTĚZOVÁ. Impact of Maize Harvest Techniques on Biomethane Production. \textit{BioEnergy Research}. New York: Springer, 2021, roč.~14, č.~1, s.~303-312. ISSN~1939-1234. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155-020-10173-0.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci