2021
The cutoff for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial cancer revisited: a European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study
WEELDEN, Willem Janvan, Casper REIJNEN, Heidi V.N. KÜSTERS-VANDEVELDE, Johan BULTEN, Peter BULT et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
The cutoff for estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in endometrial cancer revisited: a European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer collaboration study
Autoři
WEELDEN, Willem Janvan (garant), Casper REIJNEN, Heidi V.N. KÜSTERS-VANDEVELDE, Johan BULTEN, Peter BULT, Samuel LEUNG, Nicole C.M. VISSER, Maria SANTACANA, Peter BRONSERT, Marc HIRSCHFELD, Eva COLAS, Antonio GIL-MORENO, Armando REQUES, Gemma MANCEBO, Jutta HUVILA, Martin KOSKAS, Vít WEINBERGER (203 Česká republika, domácí), Markéta BEDNAŘÍKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jitka HAUSNEROVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Marc P.L.M. SNIJDERS, Xavier MATIAS-GUIU a Frédéric AMANT
Vydání
Human Pathology, Philadelphia, Elseveir, 2021, 0046-8177
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30109 Pathology
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.526
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121057
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000632654300007
Klíčová slova anglicky
Endometrial cancer; Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; Cutoff; Prognostic biomarker
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 15. 6. 2021 11:04, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
There is no consensus on the cutoff for positivity of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, we determined the cutoff value for ER and PR expression with the strongest prognostic impact on the outcome. Immunohistochemical expression of ER and PR was scored as a percentage of positive EC cell nuclei. Cutoff values were related to disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) using sensitivity, specificity, and multivariable regression analysis. The results were validated in an independent cohort. The study cohort (n = 527) included 82% of grade 1–2 and 18% of grade 3 EC. Specificity for DSS and DFS was highest for the cutoff values of 1–30%. Sensitivity was highest for the cutoff values of 80–90%. ER and PR expression were independent markers for DSS at cutoff values of 10% and 80%. Consequently, three subgroups with distinct clinical outcomes were identified: 0–10% of ER/PR expression with, unfavorable outcome (5-year DSS = 75.9–83.3%); 20–80% of ER/PR expression with, intermediate outcome (5-year DSS = 93.0–93.9%); and 90–100% of ER/PR expression with, favorable outcome (5-year DSS = 97.8–100%). The association between ER/PR subgroups and outcomes was confirmed in the validation cohort (n = 265). We propose classification of ER and PR expression based on a high-risk (0–10%), intermediate-risk (20–80%), and low-risk (90–100%) group.