J 2021

Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper

AKL, E. A., R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1-2 weeks): a GRADE concept paper

Autoři

AKL, E. A. (garant), R. L. MORGAN, A. A. ROONEY, B. BEVERLY, S. V. KATIKREDDI, A. AGARWAL, B. S. ALPER, C. ALVA-DIAZ, L. AMATO, M. T. ANSARI, J. BROZEK, D. K. CHU, P. DAHM, A. J. DARZI, M. FALAVIGNA, G. GARTLEHNER, H. PARDO-HERNANDEZ, V. KING, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), M. W. M. LANGENDAM, C. LOCKWOOD, M. MAMMEN, A. G. MATHIOUDAKIS, M. MCCAUL, J. J. MEERPOHL, S. MINOZZI, R. A. MUSTAFA, F. NONINO, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, J. RIVA, R. RODIN, N. SEKERCIOGLU, N. SKOETZ, G. TRAVERSY, K. THAYER a H. SCHUNEMANN

Vydání

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, NEW YORK, ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2021, 0895-4356

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30304 Public and environmental health

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 7.407

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121173

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000608358000001

Klíčová slova anglicky

GRADE; Urgent recommendation; Pandemic; Trustworthy guideline

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 2. 2021 12:45, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Objectives: The aim of this study is to propose an approach for developing trustworthy recommendations as part of urgent responses (1-2 week) in the clinical, public health, and health systems fields. Study Design and Setting: We conducted a review of the literature, outlined a draft approach, refined the concept through iterative discussions, a workshop by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Rapid Guidelines project group, and obtained feedback from the larger Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group. Results: A request for developing recommendations within 2 week is the usual trigger for an urgent response. Although the approach builds on the general principles of trustworthy guideline development, we highlight the following steps: (1) assess the level of urgency; (2) assess feasibility; (3) set up the organizational logistics; (4) specify the question(s); (5) collect the information needed; (6) assess the adequacy of identified information; (7) develop the recommendations using one of the 4 potential approaches: adopt existing recommendations, adapt existing recommendations, develop new recommendations using existing adequate systematic review, or develop new recommendations using expert panel input; and (8) consider an updating plan. Conclusion: An urgent response for developing recommendations requires building a cohesive, skilled, and highly motivated multidisciplinary team with the necessary clinical, scientific, and methodological expertise; adapting to shifting needs; complying with the principles of transparency; and properly managing conflicts of interest. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.