2021
Completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival of patients with cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement: ABRAX international retrospective cohort study
CIBULA, D., L. DOSTALEK, P. HILLEMANNS, G. SCAMBIA, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival of patients with cervical cancer and intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement: ABRAX international retrospective cohort study
Autoři
CIBULA, D. (203 Česká republika), L. DOSTALEK (203 Česká republika), P. HILLEMANNS, G. SCAMBIA, Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), J. PERSSON, F. RASPAGLIESI, Z. NOVAK (203 Česká republika), A. JAEGER, M. E. CAPILNA, Vít WEINBERGER (203 Česká republika, domácí), J. KLAT, R. L. SCHMIDT, A. LOPEZ, G. SCIBILIA, R. PAREJA, A. KUCUKMETIN, L. KREITNER, A. EL-BALAT, G. J. R. PEREIRA, S. LAUFHUTTE, D. ISLA-ORTIZ, T. TOPTAS, B. GIL-IBANEZ, I. VERGOTE a I. RUNNENBAUM
Vydání
European Journal of Cancer, Oxford, Elsevier Science Inc. 2021, 0959-8049
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30204 Oncology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 10.002
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121366
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000604902700014
Klíčová slova anglicky
Cervical cancer; Radical hysterectomy; Pelvic lymphadenectomy; Radical hysterectomy completion; Radical hysterectomy abandonment
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 7. 4. 2021 12:31, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background: The management of cervical cancer patients with intraoperative detection of lymph node involvement remains controversial. Since all these patients are referred for (chemo)radiation after the surgery, the key decision is whether radical hysterectomy should be completed as originally planned, taking into account an additional morbidity associated with extensive surgical dissection prior to adjuvant treatment. The ABRAX study investigated whether completing a radical uterine procedure is associated with an improved oncological outcome of such patients. Patients and methods: We performed retrospective analyses of 515 cervical cancer patients (51 institutions, 19 countries) who were referred for primary curative surgery between 2005 and 2015 (stage IA-IIB, common tumour types) in whom lymph node involvement was detected intraoperatively. Patients were stratified according to whether the planned uterine surgery was completed (COMPL group, N = 361) or abandoned (ABAND group, N = 154) to compare progression-free survival. Definitive chemoradiation was given to 92.9% patients in the ABAND group and adjuvant (chemo)radiation or chemotherapy to 91.4% of patients in the COMPL group. Results: The risks of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.154, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.799-1.666, P = 0.45), pelvic recurrence (HR 0.836, 95% CI 0.458-1.523, P = 0.56), or death (HR 1.064, 95% CI 0.690-1.641, P = 0.78) were not significantly different between the two groups. No subgroup showed a survival benefit from completing radical hysterectomy. Disease-free survival reached 74% (381/515), with a median follow-up of 58 months. Prognostic factors were balanced between the two groups. FIGO stage and number of pelvic lymph nodes involved were significant prognostic factors in the whole study cohort. Conclusion: We showed that the completion of radical hysterectomy does not improve survival in patients with intraoperatively detected lymph node involvement, regardless of tumour size or histological type. If lymph node involvement is confirmed intraoperatively, abandoning uterine radical procedure should be considered, and the patient should be referred for definitive chemoradiation. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.