Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1763399, author = {Klocek, Adam and Řiháček, Tomáš and Cígler, Hynek}, article_location = {Praha}, article_number = {2}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.65.2.163}, keywords = {GP-CORE; Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population; psychological distress; factor structure; MIRT}, language = {eng}, issn = {0009-062X}, journal = {Československá psychologie}, title = {Psychometric evaluation of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population : Czech version}, url = {https://ceskoslovenskapsychologie.cz/index.php/csps/article/view/72}, volume = {65}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1763399 AU - Klocek, Adam - Řiháček, Tomáš - Cígler, Hynek PY - 2021 TI - Psychometric evaluation of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population : Czech version JF - Československá psychologie VL - 65 IS - 2 SP - 163-177 EP - 163-177 PB - Psychologický ústav AV ČR SN - 0009062X KW - GP-CORE KW - Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population KW - psychological distress KW - factor structure KW - MIRT UR - https://ceskoslovenskapsychologie.cz/index.php/csps/article/view/72 N2 - Objectives. This study aimed to assess psychometric properties, such as reliability, construct validity, and cut-off scores, for the Czech version of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population (GP-CORE) questionnaire, a tool usable for repeated measurement of psychological distress within routine clinical settings. Participants and setting. Two general populations and one clinical sample were used with N values of 420, 394, and 345, respectively. Hypotheses. One of the competing theoretical factor solutions will demonstrate the best fit. Statistical analysis. To examine the factor structure of the GP-CORE, a confirmatory multidimensional item response theory analysis (graded response model) was employed. Results. The best fitting model was a bifactor solution representing one content domain of overall distress and two item wording domains (positively and negatively worded items). Clinical cut-off scores were determined to be 1.85 (men) and 1.90 (women). Study limitations. The GP-CORE can be used as an unidimensional measure of overall distress, but users have to be aware of the influence of positive vs. negative item wording on the responses. ER -
KLOCEK, Adam, Tomáš ŘIHÁČEK a Hynek CÍGLER. Psychometric evaluation of the Clinical Outcome in Routine Evaluation – General Population : Czech version. \textit{Československá psychologie}. Praha: Psychologický ústav AV ČR, 2021, roč.~65, č.~2, s.~163-177. ISSN~0009-062X. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.51561/cspsych.65.2.163.
|