2021
Voiding recovery after radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer patients: An international prospective multicentre trial - SENTIX
ZAPARDIEL, I., Roman KOCIAN, C. KOHLER, Jaroslav KLAT, Anna GERMANOVA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Voiding recovery after radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer patients: An international prospective multicentre trial - SENTIX
Autoři
ZAPARDIEL, I. (garant), Roman KOCIAN (203 Česká republika), C. KOHLER, Jaroslav KLAT (203 Česká republika), Anna GERMANOVA (203 Česká republika), A. JACOB, Sylva BAJSOVA (203 Česká republika), G. BOHMER, L. LAY, B. GIL-IBANEZ, Pavel HAVELKA (203 Česká republika), B. KIPP, G. SZEWCZYK, R. TOTH, J. C. STARINGER, J. DE SANTIAGO, P. J. CORONADO, R. POKA, R. LAKY, M. LUYCKX, M. FASTREZ, Ladislav DUŠEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), A. HERNANDEZ a David CIBULA (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Gynecologic Oncology, SAN DIEGO, ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE, 2021, 0090-8258
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30214 Obstetrics and gynaecology
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 5.304
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121473
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000620805400014
Klíčová slova anglicky
Radical hysterectomy; Parametrectomy; Cervical cancer; Voiding recovery; Nerve-sparing techniques
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 4. 2021 14:06, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
OBJECTIVE: Voiding dysfunctions represent a leading morbidity after radical hysterectomy performed in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to perform ad hoc analysis of factors influencing voiding recovery in SENTIX (SENTinel lymph node biopsy in cervIX cancer) trial. METHODS: The SENTIX trial (47 sites, 18 countries) is a prospective study on sentinel lymph node biopsy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Overall, the data of 300 patients were analysed. Voiding recovery was defined as the number of days from surgery to bladder catheter/epicystostomy removal or to post-voiding urine residuum <= 50 mL. RESULTS: The median voiding recovery time was three days (5th-95th percentile: 0-21): 235 (78.3%) patients recovered in <7 days and 293 (97.7%) in 30 days. Only seven (2.3%) patients recovered after 0.001) significantly influenced voiding recovery 7 days post-surgery. Type-B parametrectomy was associated with a higher risk of delayed voiding recovery than type-C1 (OR = 4.69; p = 0.023 vs. OR = 3.62; p = 0.052, respectively), followed by type-C2 (OR = 5.84; p = 0.011). Both previous pregnancy and type C2 parametrectomy indepen-dently prolonged time to voiding recovery by two days. CONCLUSIONS: Time to voiding recovery is significantly related to previous pregnancy and type of parametrectomy but it is not influenced by surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive), age, or BMI. Type B parametrectomy, without direct visualisation of nerves, was associated with longer recovery than nerve-sparing type C1. Importantly, voiding dysfunctions after radical surgery are temporary, and the majority of the patients recover in less than 30 days, including patients after C2 parametrectomy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.