2021
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Parenteral Methotrexate for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease
MLCOCH, Tomas, Barbora DECKER a Tomáš DOLEŽALZákladní údaje
Originální název
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Parenteral Methotrexate for the Treatment of Crohn's Disease
Autoři
MLCOCH, Tomas (203 Česká republika), Barbora DECKER (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí) a Tomáš DOLEŽAL (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, CHAM, SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG, 2021, 1175-5652
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30104 Pharmacology and pharmacy
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.686
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00121701
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000606723700001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Parenteral Methotrexate; Crohn's Disease; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 7. 12. 2021 09:15, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background Despite worldwide use of parenteral methotrexate (pMTX), health economic evidence for its use in Crohn's disease (CD) is limited. The low price of this generic drug has removed any commercial incentive to further invest in research. However, there is an unmet need for treatment of mild-to-moderate CD, since biological/targeted therapies are usually reserved for patients with more severe disease due to the higher costs of these treatments. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pMTX compared to the standard of care (SOC, i.e., high doses of oral corticosteroids (hdCS) followed by gradual tapering) for the treatment of mild-to-moderate CD in the Czech Republic. Methods We developed a 3-year Markov model with a 1-week cycle length comprising five health states. The model projected quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs from the healthcare payers' perspective. Efficacy data were obtained from a systematic literature review of clinical trials and extrapolated using survival analysis. Results Over a 3-year time-horizon, pMTX yields additional 0.111 QALYs (1.798 vs. 1.687) at an additional cost of euro513 (euro3087 vs. euro2574), with an incremental deterministic (probabilistic) cost-effectiveness ratio of euro4627 (euro4742)/QALY, far below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold (approximate to euro47,000/QALY). The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of pMTX being cost-effective was 100%. A one-way sensitivity and scenario analysis confirmed the robustness of the base-case result. Conclusion Parenteral MTX proved to be cost-effective in patients with mild-to-moderate CD. This is the first published cost-effectiveness analysis of pMTX for this indication. It also shows an example of a lack of valuation of generic therapy despite its cost-effectiveness and a clear benefit to the healthcare system.