2021
The marvellous Hierotopy of the golden altar in Milan : A visual Constantinopolitan fascination?
FOLETTI, IvanZákladní údaje
Originální název
The marvellous Hierotopy of the golden altar in Milan : A visual Constantinopolitan fascination?
Autoři
FOLETTI, Ivan (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
London, Icons of Space : Advances in Hierotopy, od s. 175-186, 12 s. Routledge, 2021
Nakladatel
Routledge
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
60401 Arts, Art history
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/21:00121812
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
ISBN
978-1-000-41084-6
Klíčová slova anglicky
Golden Altar; Milan; Aniconism; Constantinople; Cultural Transfer
Štítky
Změněno: 16. 5. 2022 12:46, Mgr. et Mgr. Lucie Racyn
Anotace
V originále
The golden altar of Milan is one of the most impressive monuments of the early medieval period. Decorated on its four sides, covered by golden and silver leaf, it was a clear expression of Carolingian power in Northern Italy. In its liturgical context, however, the altar must have been a marvellous epicentre of the hierotopy of the Basilica of St. Ambrose: used from all four sides, it was a precious mirror of light and of the presence for the clergy allowed to approach it. For the “common viewer” in the nave, the situation was different. Invisible in its tiny details, covered by precious stones, it would have been perceived as a giant aniconic reliquary, decorated with crosses. From this point of view, therefore, the visual aesthetic was in fact not only aniconic, but also very close to what we know about the visual patterns developed in Constantinople from the reign of Justinian to the period of the “struggle about images”. During the bishopric of Angilbert II (824-859), the patron of the altar, Milan had a strong connection with Byzantium. The aniconic Hagia Sophia was therefore certainly known from the descriptions of travellers and ambassadors. It seems therefore that Angilbert II must have been seduced by the descriptions of the aesthetic elegance of the aniconic decorations and by the prestige of Constantinople.