A Comparison of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic 3D Visualizations:
Effect on Spatial Planning in Digital Twins

J 2021

A Comparison of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic 3D Visualizations: Effect on Spatial Planning in Digital Twins

HERMAN, Lukáš, Vojtěch JUŘÍK, Dajana SNOPKOVÁ, Jiří CHMELÍK, Pavel UGWITZ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

A Comparison of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic 3D Visualizations: Effect on Spatial Planning in Digital Twins

Autoři

HERMAN, Lukáš (203 Česká republika, domácí), Vojtěch JUŘÍK (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Dajana SNOPKOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí), Jiří CHMELÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Pavel UGWITZ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zdeněk STACHOŇ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Čeněk ŠAŠINKA (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Tomáš ŘEZNÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

Remote Sensing, MDPI, 2021, 2072-4292

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10508 Physical geography

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 5.349

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/21:00122137

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13152976

UT WoS

000682149800001

Klíčová slova anglicky

3D geovisualization; digital twin; pseudo-3D visualization; real-3D visualization; user testing; virtual reality

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 14. 6. 2022 12:10, RNDr. Pavel Šmerk, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

From the user perspective, 3D geospatial data visualizations are one of the bridges between the physical and the digital world. As such, the potential of 3D geospatial data visualizations is frequently discussed within and beyond the digital twins. The effects on human cognitive processes in complex spatial tasks is rather poorly known. No uniform standards exist for the 3D technologies used in these tasks. Although stereoscopic geovisualizations presented using 3D technologies enhance depth perception, it has been suggested that the visual discomfort experienced when using 3D technology outweighs its benefits and results in lower efficiency and errors. In the present study, sixty participants using 3D technologies were tested in terms of their ability to make informed decisions in selecting the correct position of a virtual transmitter in a digital twin and a digital terrain model, respectively. Participants (n = 60) were randomly assigned into two groups, one using 3D technology engaging stereoscopic shutter glasses and the second working with standard computer screen-based visualizations. The results indicated that the participants who used shutter glasses performed significantly worse in terms of response time (W = 175.0; p < 0.001, r = −0.524). This finding verifies previous conclusions concerning the unsuitability of stereoscopic visualization technology for complex decision-making in geospatial tasks.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1570/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Geografický výzkum dynamiky přírodních a společenských prostorových procesů (Akronym: GEODYN)

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Geografický výzkum dynamiky přírodních a společenských prostorových procesů

Citovat

HERMAN, Lukáš, Vojtěch JUŘÍK, Dajana SNOPKOVÁ, Jiří CHMELÍK, Pavel UGWITZ, Zdeněk STACHOŇ, Čeněk ŠAŠINKA a Tomáš ŘEZNÍK. A Comparison of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic 3D Visualizations: Effect on Spatial Planning in Digital Twins. Remote Sensing. MDPI, 2021, roč. 13, č. 15, s. 1-21. ISSN 2072-4292. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13152976.

@article{1786917,
   author = {Herman, Lukáš and Juřík, Vojtěch and Snopková, Dajana and Chmelík, Jiří and Ugwitz, Pavel and Stachoň, Zdeněk and Šašinka, Čeněk and Řezník, Tomáš},
   article_number = {15},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13152976},
   keywords = {3D geovisualization; digital twin; pseudo-3D visualization; real-3D visualization; user testing; virtual reality},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2072-4292},
   journal = {Remote Sensing},
   title = {A Comparison of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic 3D Visualizations: Effect on Spatial Planning in Digital Twins},
   url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152976},
   volume = {13},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1786917
AU  - Herman, Lukáš - Juřík, Vojtěch - Snopková, Dajana - Chmelík, Jiří - Ugwitz, Pavel - Stachoň, Zdeněk - Šašinka, Čeněk - Řezník, Tomáš
PY  - 2021
TI  - A Comparison of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic 3D Visualizations: Effect on Spatial Planning in Digital Twins
JF  - Remote Sensing
VL  - 13
IS  - 15
SP  - 1-21
EP  - 1-21
PB  - MDPI
SN  - 20724292
KW  - 3D geovisualization
KW  - digital twin
KW  - pseudo-3D visualization
KW  - real-3D visualization
KW  - user testing
KW  - virtual reality
UR  - https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152976
N2  - From the user perspective, 3D geospatial data visualizations are one of the bridges between the physical and the digital world. As such, the potential of 3D geospatial data visualizations is frequently discussed within and beyond the digital twins. The effects on human cognitive processes in complex spatial tasks is rather poorly known. No uniform standards exist for the 3D technologies used in these tasks. Although stereoscopic geovisualizations presented using 3D technologies enhance depth perception, it has been suggested that the visual discomfort experienced when using 3D technology outweighs its benefits and results in lower efficiency and errors. In the present study, sixty participants using 3D technologies were tested in terms of their ability to make informed decisions in selecting the correct position of a virtual transmitter in a digital twin and a digital terrain model, respectively. Participants (n = 60) were randomly assigned into two groups, one using 3D technology engaging stereoscopic shutter glasses and the second working with standard computer screen-based visualizations. The results indicated that the participants who used shutter glasses performed significantly worse in terms of response time (W = 175.0; p < 0.001, r = −0.524). This finding verifies previous conclusions concerning the unsuitability of stereoscopic visualization technology for complex decision-making in geospatial tasks.
ER  -

HERMAN, Lukáš, Vojtěch JUŘÍK, Dajana SNOPKOVÁ, Jiří CHMELÍK, Pavel UGWITZ, Zdeněk STACHOŇ, Čeněk ŠAŠINKA a Tomáš ŘEZNÍK. A Comparison of Monoscopic and Stereoscopic 3D Visualizations: Effect on Spatial Planning in Digital Twins. \textit{Remote Sensing}. MDPI, 2021, roč.~13, č.~15, s.~1-21. ISSN~2072-4292. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs13152976.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci