2021
The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Children and Adolescents in the Czech Republic
HOŘÍNKOVÁ, Jana, Elis BARTEČKŮ a Lucie KALISOVAZákladní údaje
Originální název
The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Children and Adolescents in the Czech Republic
Autoři
HOŘÍNKOVÁ, Jana (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Elis BARTEČKŮ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Lucie KALISOVA (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Journal of ECT, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021, 1095-0680
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30215 Psychiatry
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.692
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00122196
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000658268800017
Klíčová slova anglicky
electroconvulsive therapy; ECT; child and adolescent psychiatry
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 2. 9. 2021 14:50, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the practice of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in child and adolescent patients in the Czech Republic. Methods: We conducted a mail questionnaire survey among Czech facilities associated with the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and university hospitals with inpatient psychiatric wards, focused on the practice of ECT between 2013 and 2017 in patients younger than 18 years. Results: Of 18 approached facilities, 13 had access to ECT, and only 6 used ECT on 16 patients. The most common diagnosis was schizophrenia or related disorders (68.75% of patients), and the most common reason for ECTwas catatonic symptoms (37.5%). The most common ECT methodology was bitemporal electrode placement with brief-pulse current (62.5%). In 2 patients, ECTwas terminated because of ineffectiveness and in 1 patient because of adverse reaction. In other patients, ECT ended after achieving a clinical effect. The most common adverse effect was transient memory impairment in a quarter of the patients. The number of pharmacological treatment attempts before ECT significantly correlated with hospitalization length. Conclusions: The utilization of ECT among children and adolescents was low. It was usually used in severe conditions after several pharmacological treatment attempts, which may indicate reluctance among providers to use this modality. A number of pharmacological attempts were associated with longer hospitalizations. In the majority of patients, ECT was effective and safe. On the other hand, the monitoring of cognitive adverse effects was insufficient and could be improved.