2021
The efficiency of antineoplastic drug contamination removal by widely used disinfectants-laboratory and hospital studies
BLÁHOVÁ, Lucie, Jan KUTA, Lenka DOLEŽALOVÁ, Šárka KOZÁKOVÁ, Tereza HOJDAROVÁ et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
The efficiency of antineoplastic drug contamination removal by widely used disinfectants-laboratory and hospital studies
Autoři
BLÁHOVÁ, Lucie (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jan KUTA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Lenka DOLEŽALOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Šárka KOZÁKOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Tereza HOJDAROVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Luděk BLÁHA (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)
Vydání
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, New York, Springer, 2021, 0340-0131
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30304 Public and environmental health
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.851
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14310/21:00120136
Organizační jednotka
Přírodovědecká fakulta
UT WoS
000630269700001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Occupational exposure; Hazardous drugs; Surface contamination; Disinfectants; Antineoplastic drugs
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 8. 12. 2021 13:12, Mgr. Marie Šípková, DiS.
Anotace
V originále
Objective Antineoplastic drugs (ADs) pose risks to healthcare staff. Surface disinfectants are used in hospitals to prevent microbial contamination but the efficiency of disinfectants to degrade ADs is not known. We studied nine disinfectants on ten ADs in the standardized laboratory and realistic in situ hospital conditions. Methods A survey in 43 hospitals prioritized nine most commonly used disinfections based on different ingredients. These were tested on inert stainless steel and in situ on contaminated hospital flooring. The effects against ten ADs were studied by LC-MS/MS (Cyclophosphamide CP; Ifosfamide IF; Capecitabine CAP; Sunitinib SUN; Methotrexate MET; Doxorubicin DOX; Irinotecan IRI; Paclitaxel PX; 5-Fluorouracil FU) and ICP-MS (Pt as a marker of platinum-based ADs). Results Monitoring of the floor contamination in 26 hospitals showed that the most contaminated are the outpatient clinics that suffer from a large turnover of staff and patients and have limited preventive measures. The most frequent ADs were Pt, PX, FU and CP with maxima exceeding the recommended 1 ng/cm(2) limit by up to 140 times. IRI, FU, MET, DOX and SUN were efficiently removed by hydrolysis in clean water and present thus lower occupational risk. Disinfectants based on hydrogen peroxide were efficient against PX and FU (> 70% degradation) but less against other ADs, such as carcinogenic CP or IF, IRI and CAP. The most efficient were the active chlorine and peracetic acid-based products, which however release irritating toxic vapors. The innovative in situ testing of ADs previously accumulated in hospital flooring showed highly problematic removal of carcinogenic CP and showed that alcohol-based disinfectants may mobilize persistent ADs contamination from deeper floor layers. Conclusion Agents based on hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, quaternary ammonium salts, glutaraldehyde, glucoprotamine or detergents can be recommended for daily use for both disinfection and AD decontamination. However, they have variable efficiencies and should be supplemented by periodic use of strong chlorine-based disinfectants efficient also against the carcinogenic and persistent CP.
Návaznosti
LM2018121, projekt VaV |
| ||
NV18-09-00188, projekt VaV |
|