2021
MRI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Measure Infarct Volume: Assessment of Manual Segmentation Variability
CIMFLOVÁ, Petra, Jiří KRÁL, Ondřej VOLNÝ, MacKenzie HORN, Piyush OJHA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
MRI Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Measure Infarct Volume: Assessment of Manual Segmentation Variability
Autoři
CIMFLOVÁ, Petra (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jiří KRÁL (203 Česká republika, domácí), Ondřej VOLNÝ (203 Česká republika), MacKenzie HORN, Piyush OJHA, Martin CABAL (203 Česká republika), Linda MACHOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jaroslav HAVELKA (203 Česká republika), Tomas JONSZTA (203 Česká republika), Michal BAR (203 Česká republika) a Wu QIU (garant)
Vydání
Journal of Neuroimaging, Hoboken, Wiley-Blackwell, 2021, 1051-2284
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30224 Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging
Stát vydavatele
Spojené státy
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.324
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00122326
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000634712300001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Ischemic lesion volume; manual segmentation variability; MRI‐ DWI; stroke imaging
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 14. 9. 2021 07:54, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Manual segmentation of infarct volume on follow-up MRI diffusion-weighted imaging (MRI-DWI) is considered the gold standard but is prone to rater variability. We assess the variability of manual segmentations of MRI-DWI infarct volume. METHODS Consecutive patients (May 2018 to May 2019) with the anterior circulation stroke and endovascularly treated were enrolled. All patients underwent 24- to 32-hour follow-up MRI. Three users manually segmented DWI infarct volumes slice by slice twice. The reference standard of DWI infarct volume was generated by the STAPLE algorithm. Intra- and interrater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by comparing manual segmentations with the reference standard. Spatial measurements were evaluated using metrics of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Volumetric measurements were compared using the lesion volume. RESULTS The dataset consisted of 44 patients, mean (SD) age was 70.1 years (+/- 10.3), 43% were women, and median baseline NIHSS score was 16. Among three users, the mean DSC for MRI-DWI infarct volume segmentations ranged from 80.6% +/- 11.7% to 88.6% +/- 7.5%, and the mean absolute volume difference was 2.8 +/- 6.8 to 13.0 +/- 14.0 ml. Interrater ICC among the users for DSC and infarct volume was .86 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: .78-.91) and .997 (95% CI: .995-.998). Intrarater ICC for the three users was .83 (95% CI: .69-.93), .84 (95% CI: .72-.91), and .80 (95% CI: .64-.89) for DSC, and .99 (95% CI: .987-.996), .991 (95% CI: .983-.995), and .996 (95% CI: .993-.998) for infarct volume. CONCLUSIONS Manual segmentation of infarct volume on follow-up MRI-DWI shows excellent agreement and good spatial overlap with the reference standard, suggesting its usefulness for measuring infarct volume on 24- to 32-hour MRI-DWI.