Other formats:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1795878, author = {Baroš, Jiří}, article_location = {Paris}, article_number = {4}, doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rmm.214.0507}, keywords = {common good; disagreement; liberalism; new theory of natural law; perfectionism; political liberalism; natural law; public justification; public reason}, language = {eng}, issn = {0035-1571}, journal = {Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale}, title = {Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response}, url = {https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2021-4-page-507.htm}, volume = {112}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR ID - 1795878 AU - Baroš, Jiří PY - 2021 TI - Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response JF - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale VL - 112 IS - 4 SP - 507-524 EP - 507-524 PB - Presses Universitaires de France SN - 00351571 KW - common good KW - disagreement KW - liberalism KW - new theory of natural law KW - perfectionism KW - political liberalism KW - natural law KW - public justification KW - public reason UR - https://www.cairn.info/revue-de-metaphysique-et-de-morale-2021-4-page-507.htm N2 - A persistent puzzle for practical philosophy centres on finding the appropriate path to justify the laws whose purpose is to regulate the functioning of constitutional democracies. Public reason liberals deny that this justification could come from comprehensive doctrines, since the laws must be justifiable to all (reasonable) citizens. The natural law tradition offers a useful test of the plausibility of this claim. This article illustrates how the two versions of public reason liberalism differ in their openness to natural law reasons, and why, given the influence of their disparate starting points on the normative standards by which they assess laws, natural law exponents have good reason to reject both. ER -
BAROŠ, Jiří. Whose Public Reason? Which Justification of Laws? A Natural Law Response. \textit{Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale}. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2021, vol.~112, No~4, p.~507-524. ISSN~0035-1571. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rmm.214.0507.
|