2021
Teachers' Professional Vision: Teachers' Gaze During the Act of Teaching and After the Event
MINAŘÍKOVÁ, Eva, Zuzana ŠMIDEKOVÁ, Miroslav JANÍK a Keneth Bo-Ingvar HOLMQVISTZákladní údaje
Originální název
Teachers' Professional Vision: Teachers' Gaze During the Act of Teaching and After the Event
Autoři
MINAŘÍKOVÁ, Eva (203 Česká republika, domácí), Zuzana ŠMIDEKOVÁ (703 Slovensko, domácí), Miroslav JANÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Keneth Bo-Ingvar HOLMQVIST (752 Švédsko)
Vydání
Frontiers in Education, LAUSANNE, FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2021, 2504-284X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Stát vydavatele
Švýcarsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14410/21:00119280
Organizační jednotka
Pedagogická fakulta
UT WoS
000697101000001
Klíčová slova anglicky
gaze; eye-tracking; professional vision; teacher; remote; mobile
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 17. 1. 2022 08:43, Dana Nesnídalová
Anotace
V originále
To date most of our knowledge on professional vision has relied on verbal data or questionnaires that used classroom videos as prompts. This has been used to tell us about a teacher's professional vision. Recently, however, new studies explore professional vision during the act of teaching through the use of mobile eye-tracking. This novel approach poses the question: how do these two "professional visions" differ? Visual attention represented by gaze was used as a proxy to studying professional vision (specifically its noticing component). To achieve this, eye-tracking as a data collection method was used. We worked with three teachers and employed eye-tracking glasses to record teacher eye movements during teaching (4 lessons per teacher; labelled as IN mode). After each lesson, we selected short clips from the lesson recorded by a static camera aimed at pupils and showed them to the same teacher (i.e., providing a similar setting as traditional studies on professional vision) while recording eye movements and gaze behavior data through a screen-based eye-tracker (labelled as ON mode). The two modes differ and due to these differences, comparison is difficult. However, by overlaying them and describing them in detail we want to highlight the exact variance observed. A comparison between IN vs ON condition in terms of dwell time on the same students in either condition was made using both quantitative (correlation) and qualitative (timeline comparison) methods. The findings suggest that the greatest differences in attention given to individual pupils occur when a pupil who was interacted with during the situation is missing from the view in the video recording. Even though individual differences are present in the patterns of gaze in IN and ON modes, the teachers in our sample consistently monitored more pupils more often in the ON mode than in the IN mode. On the other hand, the IN mode was mostly characterized by focused gaze on the pupil that the teacher interacted with in the moment with few side glances. The results aim to open a discussion about our understanding of professional vision in different contexts and about how current research may need to expand its outlook.
Návaznosti
GA17-15467S, projekt VaV |
|