2023
Effects of Seating Arrangement on Students' Interaction in Group Reflective Practice
NEHYBA, Jan, Libor JUHAŇÁK a Jakub CIGÁNZákladní údaje
Originální název
Effects of Seating Arrangement on Students' Interaction in Group Reflective Practice
Autoři
NEHYBA, Jan (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Libor JUHAŇÁK (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jakub CIGÁN (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, ABINGDON, ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. 2023, 0022-0973
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.200 v roce 2022
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14410/23:00129923
Organizační jednotka
Pedagogická fakulta
UT WoS
000701522000001
Klíčová slova anglicky
Group reflective practice; student teachers; turn-taking; facilitation; multilevel modeling; seating arrangement; sociometric badges
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 1. 3. 2023 15:18, Mgr. Daniela Marcollová
Anotace
V originále
In the conducted field experiment, we explore the intensity of university students' interaction related to the seating arrangement (circle or rows) in pre-service teachers' groups during the reflective practice. We also probe the differences across the various fields of study and evaluate the facilitator's influence on the interaction. We use wearable electronic Sociometric badges 2.0 to measure the interaction intensity (assessed by speech rate and average speaking segment length). We performed a total of 153 repeated measurements on 58 students in 4 different fields of study (Mathematics, Physics, Music, and Civic Education) using a counterbalanced design with a total of four measurements (two in circle and two in rows) in each group. Results of the multilevel modeling analysis indicate more intensive interaction in rows than in circles. However, the findings also indicate significant moderation by the field of study and partially by the extent of facilitator involvement.