J 2023

Effects of Seating Arrangement on Students' Interaction in Group Reflective Practice

NEHYBA, Jan, Libor JUHAŇÁK a Jakub CIGÁN

Základní údaje

Originální název

Effects of Seating Arrangement on Students' Interaction in Group Reflective Practice

Autoři

NEHYBA, Jan (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Libor JUHAŇÁK (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jakub CIGÁN (203 Česká republika, domácí)

Vydání

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, ABINGDON, ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD. 2023, 0022-0973

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.200 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14410/23:00129923

Organizační jednotka

Pedagogická fakulta

UT WoS

000701522000001

Klíčová slova anglicky

Group reflective practice; student teachers; turn-taking; facilitation; multilevel modeling; seating arrangement; sociometric badges

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 1. 3. 2023 15:18, Mgr. Daniela Marcollová

Anotace

V originále

In the conducted field experiment, we explore the intensity of university students' interaction related to the seating arrangement (circle or rows) in pre-service teachers' groups during the reflective practice. We also probe the differences across the various fields of study and evaluate the facilitator's influence on the interaction. We use wearable electronic Sociometric badges 2.0 to measure the interaction intensity (assessed by speech rate and average speaking segment length). We performed a total of 153 repeated measurements on 58 students in 4 different fields of study (Mathematics, Physics, Music, and Civic Education) using a counterbalanced design with a total of four measurements (two in circle and two in rows) in each group. Results of the multilevel modeling analysis indicate more intensive interaction in rows than in circles. However, the findings also indicate significant moderation by the field of study and partially by the extent of facilitator involvement.