2021
The development of de novo clinical practice guideline (CPG) for proton beam therapy (PBT) in the oncological treatment of children based on an identified health technology assessment (HTA) in the context of very low-quality evidence and lack of RCTs
KANTOROVÁ, Lucia, Tereza VRBOVÁ, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ a Miloslav KLUGARZákladní údaje
Originální název
The development of de novo clinical practice guideline (CPG) for proton beam therapy (PBT) in the oncological treatment of children based on an identified health technology assessment (HTA) in the context of very low-quality evidence and lack of RCTs
Autoři
KANTOROVÁ, Lucia (703 Slovensko, domácí), Tereza VRBOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jitka KLUGAROVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
GIN Conference 2021, 2021
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Prezentace na konferencích
Obor
30204 Oncology
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00122795
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky
proton beam therapy; clinical practice guideline; children
Změněno: 10. 11. 2021 09:39, Mgr. Bc. Alena Langaufová, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
Background The Guarantee Committee of the Czech CPG project, including the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic, commissioned the CPG of proton beam therapy (PBT) in children due to heterogeneity of practice, the current reimbursement from public sources without underlying scientific evidence, and occasional use of PBT as the first line of treatment. Objective Is PBT more effective and safe than photon radiotherapy (PRT) in children? Methods Guideline development group (GDG) was established in 2019. We searched CPGs in 36 sources in September with no results. In October, we searched eight websites and Epistemonikos for any systematic reviews (SR) and identified exactly one relevant, high-quality HTA (Washington State Authority, 2019). We translated and updated the HTA and drafted recommendations. The expert panel will meet in September 2021. Results The evidence is of very low quality from 15 comparative observational studies and 79 case series (12 and 43 for brain tumors, 1 and 16 for head and neck tumors, 2 and 7 for eye tumors, only case series for lymphomas - 2, sarcomas - 8, bone tumors - 3. None for other tumors) that PBT can be considered for the treatment of some pediatric tumors only as an alternative to PRT. Discussion
Návaznosti
MUNI/IGA/1068/2020, interní kód MU |
|