Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit
from the European Court of Human Rights

J 2021

Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights

SMEKAL, Hubert a Nino TSERETELI

Základní údaje

Originální název

Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights

Autoři

SMEKAL, Hubert a Nino TSERETELI

Vydání

European Constitutional Law Review, 2021, 1574-0196

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access časopisu

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.103

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/21:00123051

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

the European Court of Human Rights; exit; international courts; reform

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 18. 5. 2022 16:25, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

States’ growing dissatisfaction with the performance of the European Court of Human Rights – Governments’ commitment to reform process – Threats of exit that failed to materialise – Adaptation of Hirschman’s exit–voice–loyalty framework to explain states’ non-exit from the European Court of Human Rights – Sufficiently effective voice, manifestations of loyalty, and high costs of exit as possible reasons behind non-exit – Governments’ inability to achieve change in the Court’s practice unilaterally – Divergent perceptions and expectations of governments – Court’s responsiveness to governments’ concerns – Showing the importance of cautious, incremental changes to accommodate diverse governmental expectations on the role of the European Court of Human Rights

Návaznosti

101002660, interní kód MU

Název: Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay (Akronym: INFINITY)

Investor: Evropská unie, Informal Judicial Institutions: Invisible Determinants of Democratic Decay, ERC (Excellent Science)

Přiložené soubory

SMEKAL_TSERETELI_Non-Exit_EuConst_published.pdf

Citovat

SMEKAL, Hubert a Nino TSERETELI. Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights. European Constitutional Law Review. 2021, roč. 17, č. 4, s. 664-687. ISSN 1574-0196. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000377.

@article{1806480,
   author = {Smekal, Hubert and Tsereteli, Nino},
   article_number = {4},
   doi = {https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000377},
   keywords = {the European Court of Human Rights; exit; international courts; reform},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1574-0196},
   journal = {European Constitutional Law Review},
   title = {Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights},
   url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/reforming-to-please-a-comprehensive-explanation-for-nonexit-from-the-european-court-of-human-rights/7CC58B6575235D3819DBB9693DA84673#article},
   volume = {17},
   year = {2021}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1806480
AU  - Smekal, Hubert - Tsereteli, Nino
PY  - 2021
TI  - Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights
JF  - European Constitutional Law Review
VL  - 17
IS  - 4
SP  - 664-687
EP  - 664-687
SN  - 15740196
KW  - the European Court of Human Rights
KW  - exit
KW  - international courts
KW  - reform
UR  - https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/european-constitutional-law-review/article/reforming-to-please-a-comprehensive-explanation-for-nonexit-from-the-european-court-of-human-rights/7CC58B6575235D3819DBB9693DA84673#article
N2  - States’ growing dissatisfaction with the performance of the European Court of Human Rights – Governments’ commitment to reform process – Threats of exit that failed to materialise – Adaptation of Hirschman’s exit–voice–loyalty framework to explain states’ non-exit from the European Court of Human Rights – Sufficiently effective voice, manifestations of loyalty, and high costs of exit as possible reasons behind non-exit – Governments’ inability to achieve change in the Court’s practice unilaterally – Divergent perceptions and expectations of governments – Court’s responsiveness to governments’ concerns – Showing the importance of cautious, incremental changes to accommodate diverse governmental expectations on the role of the European Court of Human Rights
ER  -

SMEKAL, Hubert a Nino TSERETELI. Reforming to Please: A Comprehensive Explanation for Non-Exit from the European Court of Human Rights. \textit{European Constitutional Law Review}. 2021, roč.~17, č.~4, s.~664-687. ISSN~1574-0196. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000377.

Přehled o publikaci