s 2021

Social Networks in Educational Processes

ŠALAMOUNOVÁ, Zuzana a Jennifer M. LANGER-OSUNA

Základní údaje

Originální název

Social Networks in Educational Processes

Autoři

ŠALAMOUNOVÁ, Zuzana a Jennifer M. LANGER-OSUNA

Vydání

Studia paedagogica, 163 s. 2021

Nakladatel

Masarykova univerzita

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Editorství tematického sborníku, editorství monotematického čísla odborného časopisu

Obor

50301 Education, general; including training, pedagogy, didactics [and education systems]

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

ISSN

Klíčová slova česky

sociální sítě; vzdělávací procesy

Klíčová slova anglicky

social networks; educational processes

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 22. 4. 2022 08:32, doc. Mgr. Martin Sedláček, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Social networks have been mainly used in two directions in educational research. First, they have been used as a methodological approach whose proponents frequently rely, to give just one example, on “social network analysis” (Wasserman & Faust, 2019). Within this approach, social networks are understood as analytical structures that comprise individual actors and institutions, both of which are called nodes, and the interactions that exist between them. This enables the researchers to study the positions of individual actors within the social networks and quantify the nature of unidirectional and mutual relationships that interconnect the actors. In educational research, social networks have been employed on numerous levels ranging from small social structures (such as classrooms, see for example Kindermann, 2007) to specific macro-structures such as institutions that connect authors publishing in educational sciences (see for example Juhaňák, 2017). Second, social networks have been used by authors as the theoretical background for their research. In this area, social networks are understood as “an analytical construct” with “observed and nonobserved dyadic relationships between actors” (Fuhse, 2009, p. 52). Within this second approach, social networks are discovered by authors through research of interactions represented by communicative processes and mediate what is happening 6 EDITORIAL between individual or corporate actors in social networks, and through meanings emerging from the interactions (Fuhse, 2009; see for example Engle et al., 2014; Karam et al., 2019). By observing interactions and studying meanings that lie at the background of these interactions, researchers can create estimates about the nature of social networks and describe in detail the processes ongoing within them. Studies printed in this issue approach social networks from both of these directions. The first four studies employ social networks as a methodological framework; the last three studies use them as a theoretical framework.