2022
Interrater Agreement and Detection Accuracy for Medium-Vessel Occlusions Using Single-Phase and Multiphase CT Angiography
OSPEL, J. M.; F. BALA; R. V. MCDONOUGH; Ondřej VOLNÝ; N. KASHANI et. al.Basic information
Original name
Interrater Agreement and Detection Accuracy for Medium-Vessel Occlusions Using Single-Phase and Multiphase CT Angiography
Authors
OSPEL, J. M.; F. BALA; R. V. MCDONOUGH; Ondřej VOLNÝ (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution); N. KASHANI; W.. QIU; B. K. MENON and M. GOYAL (guarantor)
Edition
American Journal of Neuroradiology, Denville, American Society of Neuroradiology, 2022, 0195-6108
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30210 Clinical neurology
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 3.500
RIV identification code
RIV/00216224:14110/22:00125091
Organization unit
Faculty of Medicine
UT WoS
000722313700001
EID Scopus
2-s2.0-85123651406
Keywords in English
Medium-Vessel Occlusions; Single-Phase and Multiphase CT Angiography
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 14/3/2023 08:44, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Abstract
In the original language
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate and reliable detection of medium-vessel occlusions is important to establish the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke and initiate appropriate treatment with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy. However, medium-vessel occlusions are often challenging to detect, especially for unexperienced readers. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interrater agreement of the detection of medium-vessel occlusions using single-phase and multiphase CTA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-phase and multiphase CTA of 120 patients with acute ischemic stroke (20 with no occlusion, 44 with large-vessel occlusion, and 56 with medium-vessel occlusion in the anterior and posterior circulation) were assessed by 3 readers with varying levels of experience (session 1: single-phase CTA; session 2: multiphase CTA). Interrater agreement for occlusion type (large-vessel occlusion versus medium-vessel occlusion versus no occlusion) and for detailed occlusion sites was calculated using the Fleiss ? with 95% confidence intervals. Accuracy for the detection of medium-vessel occlusions was calculated for each reader using classification tables. RESULTS: Interrater agreement for occlusion type was moderate for single-phase CTA (? ?=?0.58; 95% CI, 0.56?0.62) and almost perfect for multiphase CTA (? = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78?0.83). Interrater agreement for detailed occlusion sites was moderate for single-phase CTA (? = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.53?0.56) and substantial for multiphase CTA (? = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.67?0.74). On single-phase CTA, readers 1, 2, and 3 classified 33/56 (59%), 34/56 (61%), and 32/56 (57%) correctly as medium-vessel occlusions. On multiphase CTA, 48/56 (86%), 50/56 (89%), and 50/56 (89%) medium-vessel occlusions were classified correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Interrater agreement for medium-vessel occlusions is moderate when using single-phase CTA and almost perfect with multiphase CTA. Detection accuracy is substantially higher with multiphase CTA compared with single-phase CTA, suggesting that multiphase CTA might be a valuable tool for assessment of medium-vessel occlusion stroke.