Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based
versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study

J 2022

Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study

STANĚK, Ján, Abanoub RIAD, Adam LE, Matěj BERNÁT, Milad HAMMAL et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study

Autoři

STANĚK, Ján (203 Česká republika), Abanoub RIAD (818 Egypt, domácí), Adam LE (203 Česká republika), Matěj BERNÁT (203 Česká republika), Milad HAMMAL a Basel AZAR

Vydání

Materials, Basel, MDPI, 2022, 1996-1944

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30304 Public and environmental health

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.400

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/22:00125128

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010312

UT WoS

000752782000001

Klíčová slova anglicky

cohort studies; complications; dental cements; inlay; onlay; overlay; resin cements; survival rate

Štítky

14110525, rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 5. 4. 2023 08:13, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical performance, survival, and complications of indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays on posterior teeth. Digital records of 282 patients treated between 2014 and 2018 were accessed and analyzed retrospectively. The included patients received 469 composite restorations luted with seven different resin-based types of cement, i.e., Filtek Ultimate Flow, Enamel Plus, Relyx Ultimate, Harvard Premium Flow, Relyx Unicem, Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable, and Filtek Ultimate. The restorations had been clinically and radiographically evaluated annually. The mechanical and clinical complications, e.g., debonding, fracture, and secondary caries, were evaluated and recorded. The examined restorations exhibited a high survival rate (84.9%), and failure was found in only 71 cases. Fracture was the most common cause (n = 36), followed by prosthetic work release (n = 19) and secondary caries (n = 16). There was a statistically significant difference between failure and cement material (Sig. < 0.001); the composite-based cements (87.2%) had a high survival rate compared to the resin-based cement (72.7%). Similarly, the cements with high viscosity (90.2%) had significantly higher survival rates than the low-viscosity cements (78.9%). Moreover, onlays showed higher longevity compared to overlays (Sig. = 0.007), and patients aged under 55 years showed less complications (Sig. = 0.036). Indirect composite restoration was a successful solution to tooth structure loss. The material of the cementation is an important part of the success. Higher survival rate was found in our study when the fixation materials with high viscosity were used, thus suggesting using these materials with indirect restorations. Composite-based cements had significantly higher survival rate than resin-based cements.

Návaznosti

EF19_073/0016943, projekt VaV

Název: Interní grantová agentura Masarykovy univerzity

MUNI/A/1608/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Prohlubování znalostí v oblasti zdravotních rizik a benefitů výživy, prostředí a životního stylu III

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Prohlubování znalostí v oblasti zdravotních rizik a benefitů výživy, prostředí a životního stylu III

MUNI/IGA/1543/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Evidence-based Practice of Healthcare Professionals and Students in the Czech Republic (Akronym: Evidence-Based Practice in Czechia)

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Evidence-based Practice of Healthcare Professionals and Students in the Czech Republic

Citovat

STANĚK, Ján, Abanoub RIAD, Adam LE, Matěj BERNÁT, Milad HAMMAL a Basel AZAR. Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study. Materials. Basel: MDPI, 2022, roč. 15, č. 1, s. 1-18. ISSN 1996-1944. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010312.

@article{1816359,
   author = {Staněk, Ján and Riad, Abanoub and Le, Adam and Bernát, Matěj and Hammal, Milad and Azar, Basel},
   article_location = {Basel},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010312},
   keywords = {cohort studies; complications; dental cements; inlay; onlay; overlay; resin cements; survival rate},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1996-1944},
   journal = {Materials},
   title = {Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study},
   url = {https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/1/312},
   volume = {15},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1816359
AU  - Staněk, Ján - Riad, Abanoub - Le, Adam - Bernát, Matěj - Hammal, Milad - Azar, Basel
PY  - 2022
TI  - Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study
JF  - Materials
VL  - 15
IS  - 1
SP  - 1-18
EP  - 1-18
PB  - MDPI
SN  - 19961944
KW  - cohort studies
KW  - complications
KW  - dental cements
KW  - inlay
KW  - onlay
KW  - overlay
KW  - resin cements
KW  - survival rate
UR  - https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/1/312
N2  - The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical performance, survival, and complications of indirect composite inlays, onlays, and overlays on posterior teeth. Digital records of 282 patients treated between 2014 and 2018 were accessed and analyzed retrospectively. The included patients received 469 composite restorations luted with seven different resin-based types of cement, i.e., Filtek Ultimate Flow, Enamel Plus, Relyx Ultimate, Harvard Premium Flow, Relyx Unicem, Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable, and Filtek Ultimate. The restorations had been clinically and radiographically evaluated annually. The mechanical and clinical complications, e.g., debonding, fracture, and secondary caries, were evaluated and recorded. The examined restorations exhibited a high survival rate (84.9%), and failure was found in only 71 cases. Fracture was the most common cause (n = 36), followed by prosthetic work release (n = 19) and secondary caries (n = 16). There was a statistically significant difference between failure and cement material (Sig. < 0.001); the composite-based cements (87.2%) had a high survival rate compared to the resin-based cement (72.7%). Similarly, the cements with high viscosity (90.2%) had significantly higher survival rates than the low-viscosity cements (78.9%). Moreover, onlays showed higher longevity compared to overlays (Sig. = 0.007), and patients aged under 55 years showed less complications (Sig. = 0.036). Indirect composite restoration was a successful solution to tooth structure loss. The material of the cementation is an important part of the success. Higher survival rate was found in our study when the fixation materials with high viscosity were used, thus suggesting using these materials with indirect restorations. Composite-based cements had significantly higher survival rate than resin-based cements.
ER  -

STANĚK, Ján, Abanoub RIAD, Adam LE, Matěj BERNÁT, Milad HAMMAL a Basel AZAR. Survival of Prosthodontic Restorations Luted with Resin-Based versus Composite-Based Cements: Retrospective Cohort Study. \textit{Materials}. Basel: MDPI, 2022, roč.~15, č.~1, s.~1-18. ISSN~1996-1944. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma15010312.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci