J 2023

Biosimilar SB11 versus reference ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year phase III randomised clinical trial outcomes

BRESSLER, N. M., M. VEITH, Jan HAMOUZ, Jan ERNEST, D. ZALEWSKI et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Biosimilar SB11 versus reference ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year phase III randomised clinical trial outcomes

Autoři

BRESSLER, N. M., M. VEITH, Jan HAMOUZ (203 Česká republika), Jan ERNEST (203 Česká republika), D. ZALEWSKI, Jan STUDNICKA (203 Česká republika), A. VAJAS, A. PAPP, G. VOGT, J. LUU, Veronika MATUŠKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Y. H. YOON, T. PREGUN, T. KIM, D. SHIN, I. OH, H. JEONG, M. Y. KIM a S. J. WOO (garant)

Vydání

The British journal of ophthalmology : incorporating the Royal London ophthalmic hospital reports, the Ophthalmic review and the Ophthalmoscope, London, British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023, 0007-1161

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30207 Ophthalmology

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 4.100 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00129940

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000723337800001

Klíčová slova anglicky

retina; neovascularisation; macula; degeneration

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 1. 2024 09:44, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background/Aims To provide longer-term data on efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 compared with the reference ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods Setting: Multicentre. Design: Randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, phase III equivalence study. Patient population: >= 50 years old participants with nAMD (n=705), one 'study eye'. Intervention: 1:1 randomisation to monthly intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg SB11 or RBZ. Main outcome measures: Visual efficacy endpoints, safety, immunogenicity and PK up to 52 weeks. Results Baseline and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Of 705 randomised participants (SB11: n=351; RBZ: n=354), 634 participants (89.9%; SB11: n=307; RBZ: n=327) completed the study until week 52. Previously reported equivalence in primary efficacy remained stable up to week 52 and were comparable between SB11 and RBZ. The adjusted treatment difference between SB11 and RBZ in full analysis set at week 52 of change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity was -0.6 letters (90% CI -2.1 to 0.9) and of change from baseline in central subfield thickness was -14.9 mu m (95% CI -25.3 to -4.5). The incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB11: 32.0% vs RBZ: 29.7%) and serious ocular TEAE (SB11: 2.9% vs RBZ: 2.3%) appeared comparable between treatment groups, and no new safety concerns were observed. The PK and immunogenicity profiles were comparable, with a 4.2% and 5.5% cumulative incidence of antidrug antibodies up to week 52 for SB11 and RBZ, respectively. Conclusions Longer-term results of this study further support the biosimilarity established between SB11 and RBZ.