2023
Biosimilar SB11 versus reference ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year phase III randomised clinical trial outcomes
BRESSLER, N. M., M. VEITH, Jan HAMOUZ, Jan ERNEST, D. ZALEWSKI et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Biosimilar SB11 versus reference ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year phase III randomised clinical trial outcomes
Autoři
BRESSLER, N. M., M. VEITH, Jan HAMOUZ (203 Česká republika), Jan ERNEST (203 Česká republika), D. ZALEWSKI, Jan STUDNICKA (203 Česká republika), A. VAJAS, A. PAPP, G. VOGT, J. LUU, Veronika MATUŠKOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Y. H. YOON, T. PREGUN, T. KIM, D. SHIN, I. OH, H. JEONG, M. Y. KIM a S. J. WOO (garant)
Vydání
The British journal of ophthalmology : incorporating the Royal London ophthalmic hospital reports, the Ophthalmic review and the Ophthalmoscope, London, British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2023, 0007-1161
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30207 Ophthalmology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.100 v roce 2022
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00129940
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000723337800001
Klíčová slova anglicky
retina; neovascularisation; macula; degeneration
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 1. 2024 09:44, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background/Aims To provide longer-term data on efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ranibizumab biosimilar SB11 compared with the reference ranibizumab (RBZ) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods Setting: Multicentre. Design: Randomised, double-masked, parallel-group, phase III equivalence study. Patient population: >= 50 years old participants with nAMD (n=705), one 'study eye'. Intervention: 1:1 randomisation to monthly intravitreal injection of 0.5 mg SB11 or RBZ. Main outcome measures: Visual efficacy endpoints, safety, immunogenicity and PK up to 52 weeks. Results Baseline and disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Of 705 randomised participants (SB11: n=351; RBZ: n=354), 634 participants (89.9%; SB11: n=307; RBZ: n=327) completed the study until week 52. Previously reported equivalence in primary efficacy remained stable up to week 52 and were comparable between SB11 and RBZ. The adjusted treatment difference between SB11 and RBZ in full analysis set at week 52 of change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity was -0.6 letters (90% CI -2.1 to 0.9) and of change from baseline in central subfield thickness was -14.9 mu m (95% CI -25.3 to -4.5). The incidence of ocular treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB11: 32.0% vs RBZ: 29.7%) and serious ocular TEAE (SB11: 2.9% vs RBZ: 2.3%) appeared comparable between treatment groups, and no new safety concerns were observed. The PK and immunogenicity profiles were comparable, with a 4.2% and 5.5% cumulative incidence of antidrug antibodies up to week 52 for SB11 and RBZ, respectively. Conclusions Longer-term results of this study further support the biosimilarity established between SB11 and RBZ.