2021
ASPECTS Interobserver Agreement of 100 Investigators from the TENSION Study
HORN, van N., H. KNIEP, G. BROOCKS, L. MEYER, F. FLOTTMANN et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
ASPECTS Interobserver Agreement of 100 Investigators from the TENSION Study
Autoři
HORN, van N. (garant), H. KNIEP, G. BROOCKS, L. MEYER, F. FLOTTMANN, M. BECHSTEIN, J. GOTZ, G. THOMALLA, M. BENDSZUS, S. BONEKAMP, JAR. PFAFF, PR. DELLANI, J. FIEHLER a U. HANNING
Vydání
CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, HEIDELBERG, SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, 2021, 1869-1439
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30230 Other clinical medicine subjects
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 3.156
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00124106
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000612304600001
Klíčová slova česky
Acute stroke therapy; Brain; Endovascular treatment; Interrater reliability; Ischemic stroke; Krippendorff's alpha
Klíčová slova anglicky
Acute stroke therapy; Brain; Endovascular treatment; Interrater reliability; Ischemic stroke; Krippendorff's alpha
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 3. 5. 2022 08:46, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Purpose Evaluating the extent of cerebral ischemic infarction is essential for treatment decisions and assessment of possible complications in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patients are often triaged according to image-based early signs of infarction, defined by Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Our aim was to evaluate interrater reliability in a large group of readers. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 100 investigators who independently evaluated 20 non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) scans as part of their qualification program for the TENSION study. Test cases were chosen by four neuroradiologists who had previously scored NCCT scans with ASPECTS between 0 and 8 and high interrater agreement. Percent and interrater agreements were calculated for total ASPECTS, as well as for each ASPECTS region. Results Percent agreements for ASPECTS ratings was 28%, with interrater agreement of 0.13 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.09-0.16), at zero tolerance allowance and 66%, with interrater agreement of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.21-0.44), at tolerance allowance set by TENSION inclusion criteria. ASPECTS region with highest level of agreement was the insular cortex (percent agreement = 96%, interrater agreement = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97)) and with lowest level of agreement the M3 region (percent agreement = 68%, interrater agreement = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.17-0.61]). Conclusion Interrater agreement reliability for total ASPECTS and study enrollment was relatively low but seems sufficient for practical application. Individual region analysis suggests that some are particularly difficult to evaluate, with varying levels of reliability. Potential impairment of the supraganglionic region must be examined carefully, particularly with respect to the decision whether or not to perform mechanical thrombectomy.
Návaznosti
90128, velká výzkumná infrastruktura |
|