2021
Sex difference and intra-operative tidal volume Insights from the LAS VEGAS study
NIJBROEK, SG, L HOL, P SWART, SNT HEMMES, AS NETO et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Sex difference and intra-operative tidal volume Insights from the LAS VEGAS study
Autoři
NIJBROEK, SG, L HOL, P SWART, SNT HEMMES, AS NETO, JM BINNEKADE, G HEDENSTIERNA, S JABER, M HIESMAYR, MW HOLLMANN, GH MILLS, MFV MELO, C PUTENSEN, W SCHMID, P SEVERGNINI, H WRIGGE, Abreu MG DE, P PELOSI a MJ SCHULTZ
Vydání
European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2021, 0265-0215
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 4.183
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000693373000005
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 28. 4. 2022 14:39, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
BACKGROUND One key element of lung-protective ventilation is the use of a low tidal volume (V-T). A sex difference in use of low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) has been described in critically ill ICU patients. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine whether a sex difference in use of LTVV also exists in operating room patients, and if present what factors drive this difference. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND SETTING This is a posthoc analysis of LAS VEGAS, a 1-week worldwide observational study in adults requiring intra-operative ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery in 146 hospitals in 29 countries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Women and men were compared with respect to use of LTVV, defined as V-T of 8 ml kg(-1) or less predicted bodyweight (PBW). A V-T was deemed 'default' if the set V-T was a round number. A mediation analysis assessed which factors may explain the sex difference in use of LTVV during intra-operative ventilation. RESULTS This analysis includes 9864 patients, of whom 5425 (55%) were women. A default V-T was often set, both in women and men; mode V-T was 500 ml. Median [IQR] V-T was higher in women than in men (8.6 [7.7 to 9.6] vs. 7.6 [6.8 to 8.4] ml kg(-1) PBW, P < 0.001). Compared with men, women were twice as likely not to receive LTVV [68.8 vs. 36.0%; relative risk ratio 2.1 (95% CI 1.9 to 2.1), P < 0.001]. In the mediation analysis, patients' height and actual body weight (ABW) explained 81 and 18% of the sex difference in use of LTVV, respectively; it was not explained by the use of a default V-T. CONCLUSION In this worldwide cohort of patients receiving intra-operative ventilation during general anaesthesia for surgery, women received a higher V-T than men during intra-operative ventilation. The risk for a female not to receive LTVV during surgery was double that of males. Height and ABW were the two mediators of the sex difference in use of LTVV.