2021
Application of two job indices for general occupational demands in a pooled analysis of case-control studies on lung cancer
HOVANEC, J., J. SIEMIATYCKI, D. I. CONWAY, A. OLSSON, P. GUENEL et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Application of two job indices for general occupational demands in a pooled analysis of case-control studies on lung cancer
Autoři
HOVANEC, J. (garant), J. SIEMIATYCKI, D. I. CONWAY, A. OLSSON, P. GUENEL, D. LUCE, K. H. JOCKEL, H. POHLABELN, W. AHRENS, S. KARRASCH, H. E. WICHMANN, P. GUSTAVSSON, D. CONSONNI, F. MERLETTI, L. RICHIARDI, L. SIMONATO, C. FORTES, M. E. PARENT, J. R. MCLAUGHLIN, P. DEMERS, M. T. LANDI, N. CAPORASO, G. FERNANDEZ-TARDON, D. ZARIDZE, B. SWIATKOWSKA, T. PANDICS, J. LISSOWSKA, E. FABIANOVA, J. K. FIELD, D. MATES, V. BENCKO, Lenka FORETOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), V. JANOUT, H. KROMHOUT, R. VERMEULEN, P. BOFFETTA, K. STRAIF, J. SCHUZ, S. CASJENS, B. PESCH, T. BRUNING a T. BEHRENS
Vydání
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, HELSINKI, SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2021, 0355-3140
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30204 Oncology
Stát vydavatele
Finsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 5.492
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00124149
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000691783300008
Klíčová slova anglicky
job index; psychosocial; smoking; social prestige; tumor subtype
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 15. 2. 2022 08:22, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Objectives We investigated general job demands as a risk factor for lung cancer as well as their role in the association between occupational prestige and lung cancer. Methods In 13 case-control studies on lung cancer, as part of the international SYNERGY project, we applied indices for physical (PHI) and psychosocial (PSI) job demands - each with four categories (high to low). We estimated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for lung cancer by unconditional logistic regression, separately for men and women and adjusted for study centre, age, smoking behavior, and former employment in occupations with potential exposure to carcinogens. Further, we investigated, whether higher risks among men with low occupational prestige (Treiman's Standard International Occupational Prestige Scale) were affected by adjustment for the job indices. Results In 30 355 men and 7371 women, we found increased risks (OR) for lung cancer with high relative to low job demands in both men [PHI 1.74 (95% CI 1.56-1.93), PSI 1.33 (95% CI 1.17-1.51)] and women [PHI 1.62 (95% CI 1.24-2.11), PSI 1.31 (95% CI 1.09-1.56)]. OR for lung cancer among men with low occupational prestige were slightly reduced when adjusting for PHI [low versus high prestige OR from 1.44 (95% CI 1.32-1.58) to 1.30 (95% CI 1.17-1.45)], but not PSI. Conclusions Higher physical job demands were associated with increased risks of lung cancer, while associations for higher psychosocial demands were less strong. In contrast to physical demands, psychosocial demands did not contribute to clarify the association of occupational prestige and lung cancer.