J 2023

Effectiveness of ICD therapy in real clinical practice. The Olomouc ICD Registry

TABORSKY, Milos, Tomas SKALA, Marian FEDORCO, Vlastimil DOUPAL, Ingrid SOVOVA et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Effectiveness of ICD therapy in real clinical practice. The Olomouc ICD Registry

Autoři

TABORSKY, Milos (203 Česká republika), Tomas SKALA (203 Česká republika, garant), Marian FEDORCO (203 Česká republika), Vlastimil DOUPAL (203 Česká republika), Ingrid SOVOVA (203 Česká republika), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Klára BENEŠOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Monika BEZDEKOVA (203 Česká republika), Marek VICHA (203 Česká republika), Josef DANEK (203 Česká republika) a Josef KAUTZNER (203 Česká republika)

Vydání

Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University, Olomouc, Palacky University, 2023, 1213-8118

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30230 Other clinical medicine subjects

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 0.900 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00129947

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000733638200001

Klíčová slova anglicky

implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; heart failure; primary prevention; time to shock; sppropriate shock; mortality

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 1. 2024 09:48, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Background. Clinical parameters linked to a low benefit of ICD implantation and increased mortality risks are needed for an individualized assessment of potential benefits and risks of ICD implantation. Methods. Analysis of a prospective registry of all patients hospitalized from 2009 to 2019 in a single centre for a first Results. A total of 2,681 patients were included in the registry. Until the end of follow-up (38.4 +/- 29.1 months), 682 (25.4%) patients died. The one-year mortality in all patients, the one-year CV mortality, the three-year mortality in all patients, and the three-year CV mortality were 7.8%, 5.7%, 20.6%, and 14.8%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference when the subgroups were compared according to the type of cardiomyopathy. No significant difference was found between primary and secondary prevention and between the types of devices. Male gender, age >= 75 years, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation were associated with a significantly increased mortality risk. Conclusion. In an analysis of a long-term follow-up of 2,681 ICD patients, we found no mortality difference between patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and in the device type. A higher mortality risk was found in men, patients older than 75 years, diabetics, and those with atrial fibrillation.