2023
Effectiveness of ICD therapy in real clinical practice. The Olomouc ICD Registry
TABORSKY, Milos, Tomas SKALA, Marian FEDORCO, Vlastimil DOUPAL, Ingrid SOVOVA et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Effectiveness of ICD therapy in real clinical practice. The Olomouc ICD Registry
Autoři
TABORSKY, Milos (203 Česká republika), Tomas SKALA (203 Česká republika, garant), Marian FEDORCO (203 Česká republika), Vlastimil DOUPAL (203 Česká republika), Ingrid SOVOVA (203 Česká republika), Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Klára BENEŠOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Monika BEZDEKOVA (203 Česká republika), Marek VICHA (203 Česká republika), Josef DANEK (203 Česká republika) a Josef KAUTZNER (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
Biomedical Papers, Olomouc: Palacky University, Olomouc, Palacky University, 2023, 1213-8118
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30230 Other clinical medicine subjects
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 0.900 v roce 2022
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00129947
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000733638200001
Klíčová slova anglicky
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; heart failure; primary prevention; time to shock; sppropriate shock; mortality
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 1. 2024 09:48, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Background. Clinical parameters linked to a low benefit of ICD implantation and increased mortality risks are needed for an individualized assessment of potential benefits and risks of ICD implantation. Methods. Analysis of a prospective registry of all patients hospitalized from 2009 to 2019 in a single centre for a first Results. A total of 2,681 patients were included in the registry. Until the end of follow-up (38.4 +/- 29.1 months), 682 (25.4%) patients died. The one-year mortality in all patients, the one-year CV mortality, the three-year mortality in all patients, and the three-year CV mortality were 7.8%, 5.7%, 20.6%, and 14.8%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference when the subgroups were compared according to the type of cardiomyopathy. No significant difference was found between primary and secondary prevention and between the types of devices. Male gender, age >= 75 years, diabetes mellitus, and atrial fibrillation were associated with a significantly increased mortality risk. Conclusion. In an analysis of a long-term follow-up of 2,681 ICD patients, we found no mortality difference between patients with ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and in the device type. A higher mortality risk was found in men, patients older than 75 years, diabetics, and those with atrial fibrillation.