Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1840957,
author = {Kavková, Michaela and Šulcová, Marie and Zikmund, Tomáš and Pyszko, Martin and Kaiser, Jozef and Buchtová, Marcela},
article_number = {March},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac016},
keywords = {micro-CT; 3D imaging; reptiles; tooth-bone attachment; skull; craniofacial bones; tooth replacement},
language = {eng},
issn = {2047-217X},
journal = {GigaScience},
title = {X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/doi/10.1093/gigascience/giac016/6543636},
volume = {11},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1840957
AU - Kavková, Michaela - Šulcová, Marie - Zikmund, Tomáš - Pyszko, Martin - Kaiser, Jozef - Buchtová, Marcela
PY - 2022
TI - X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition
JF - GigaScience
VL - 11
IS - March
SP - 1-12
EP - 1-12
PB - Oxford University Press
SN - 2047217X
KW - micro-CT
KW - 3D imaging
KW - reptiles
KW - tooth-bone attachment
KW - skull
KW - craniofacial bones
KW - tooth replacement
UR - https://academic.oup.com/gigascience/article/doi/10.1093/gigascience/giac016/6543636
N2 - Background Reptiles exhibit a large heterogeneity in teeth morphology. The main variability comprises the different tooth shape, the type of tooth attachment to the underlying bone, or the ability to replace the teeth. Findings Here, we provide full datasets of microtomography scans and 3D models of reptilian dentitions and skulls. We selected representative species for each of 9 reptilian families on the basis of their characteristic dental features. Because there are ≥4 different types of tooth-bone attachments, ranging from the mammalian-like thecodont attachment found in crocodilians to the simple acrodont implantation observed in some lizards, we aimed to evaluate species with different types of tooth-bone attachments. Moreover, another interesting feature varying in reptilian species is the complexity of tooth shape or the number of tooth generations, which can be associated with the type of tooth attachment to the jawbone. Therefore, selected model species also include animals with distinct tooth morphology along the jaw or different number of tooth generations. The development of tooth attachment and relationship of the tooth to the jaw can be further analysed in detail on a large collection of pre-hatching stages of chameleon. Next, we introduce different possibilities for how these datasets can be further used to study tooth-bone relationships or tooth morphology in 3D space. Moreover, these datasets can be valuable for additional morphological and morphometric analyses of reptilian skulls or their individually segmented skeletal elements. Conclusions Our collection of microcomputed tomography scans can bring new insight into dental or skeletal research. The broad selection of reptilian species, together with their unique dental features and high quality of these scans including complete series of developmental stages of our model species and provide large opportunities for their reuse. Scans can be further used for virtual reality, 3D printing, or in education.
ER -
KAVKOVÁ, Michaela, Marie ŠULCOVÁ, Tomáš ZIKMUND, Martin PYSZKO, Jozef KAISER a Marcela BUCHTOVÁ. X-ray microtomography imaging of craniofacial hard tissues in selected reptile species with different types of dentition. \textit{GigaScience}. Oxford University Press, 2022, roč.~11, March, s.~1-12. ISSN~2047-217X. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giac016.
|
