Internet Jurisdiction and Intermediary Liability

C 2020

Internet Jurisdiction and Intermediary Liability

SVANTESSON, Dan Jerker Börje

Basic information

Original name

Internet Jurisdiction and Intermediary Liability

Authors

SVANTESSON, Dan Jerker Börje (36 Australia, guarantor, belonging to the institution)

Edition

Oxford, Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability, p. 691-708, 18 pp. 2020

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Field of Study

50501 Law

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Publication form

printed version "print"

References:

URL

RIV identification code

RIV/00216224:14220/20:00124502

Organization unit

Faculty of Law

ISBN

978-0-19-883714-5

Keywords in English

internet; jurisdiction; liability; online

Abstract

V originále

This chapter seeks to set the scene and make some proposals for how we may make progress in the field of internet jurisdiction. For this purpose, the chapter will focus on three examples where the matter of internet jurisdiction is a major concern for internet intermediaries. The first relates to the validity of the terms of service that internet intermediaries typically impose on their users, and which typically contain important provisions regarding jurisdiction and applicable law. The second example relates to situations in which law enforcement agencies seek access to user data held by internet intermediaries. Such situations give rise to important matters of jurisdiction, not only where the requesting law enforcement agency and the internet intermediary are based in different countries, but may also—as was illustrated in the well-known Microsoft Warrant case—give rise to such issues where the requested data is stored outside the country in which both the law enforcement agency and the internet intermediary are based. The third example relates to the matter of geographical scope where an internet intermediary is required to remove, block, take down, delist, de-index, or de-reference content.

Links

EF16_019/0000822, research and development project

Name: Centrum excelence pro kyberkriminalitu, kyberbezpečnost a ochranu kritických informačních infrastruktur

Citovat

SVANTESSON, Dan Jerker Börje. Internet Jurisdiction and Intermediary Liability. In Giancarlo Frosio. Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, p. 691-708. ISBN 978-0-19-883714-5.

@inbook{1845722,
   author = {Svantesson, Dan Jerker Börje},
   address = {Oxford},
   booktitle = {Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability},
   editor = {Giancarlo Frosio},
   keywords = {internet; jurisdiction; liability; online},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Oxford},
   isbn = {978-0-19-883714-5},
   pages = {691-708},
   publisher = {Oxford University Press},
   title = {Internet Jurisdiction and Intermediary Liability},
   url = {https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198837138.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198837138-e-36},
   year = {2020}
}

TY  - CHAP
ID  - 1845722
AU  - Svantesson, Dan Jerker Börje
PY  - 2020
TI  - Internet Jurisdiction and Intermediary Liability
VL  - Neuveden
PB  - Oxford University Press
CY  - Oxford
SN  - 9780198837145
KW  - internet
KW  - jurisdiction
KW  - liability
KW  - online
UR  - https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198837138.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198837138-e-36
N2  - This chapter seeks to set the scene and make some proposals for how we may make progress in the field of internet jurisdiction. For this purpose, the chapter will focus on three examples where the matter of internet jurisdiction is a major concern for internet intermediaries. The first relates to the validity of the terms of service that internet intermediaries typically impose on their users, and which typically contain important provisions regarding jurisdiction and applicable law. The second example relates to situations in which law enforcement agencies seek access to user data held by internet intermediaries. Such situations give rise to important matters of jurisdiction, not only where the requesting law enforcement agency and the internet intermediary are based in different countries, but may also—as was illustrated in the well-known Microsoft Warrant case—give rise to such issues where the requested data is stored outside the country in which both the law enforcement agency and the internet intermediary are based. The third example relates to the matter of geographical scope where an internet intermediary is required to remove, block, take down, delist, de-index, or de-reference content.
ER  -

SVANTESSON, Dan Jerker Börje. Internet Jurisdiction and Intermediary Liability. In Giancarlo Frosio. \textit{Oxford Handbook of Online Intermediary Liability}. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, p.~691-708. ISBN~978-0-19-883714-5.

Detailed Information on Publication Record