The moralization bias of gods’ minds : a cross-cultural test

J 2022

The moralization bias of gods’ minds : a cross-cultural test

PURZYCKI, Benjamin, Aiyana WILLARD, Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ, Coren APICELLA, Quentin ATKINSON et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

The moralization bias of gods’ minds : a cross-cultural test

Autoři

PURZYCKI, Benjamin (840 Spojené státy), Aiyana WILLARD (124 Kanada), Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Coren APICELLA (840 Spojené státy), Quentin ATKINSON (554 Nový Zéland), Alex BOLYANATZ (840 Spojené státy), Emma COHEN (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko), Carla HANDLEY (840 Spojené státy), Joseph HENRICH (840 Spojené státy), Martin LANG (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Carolyn LESOGOROL (840 Spojené státy), Sarah MATHEW (840 Spojené státy), Rita MCNAMARA (840 Spojené státy), Cristina MOYA (840 Spojené státy), Ara NORENZAYAN (840 Spojené státy), Caitlyn D PLACEK (840 Spojené státy), Monserrat SOLER (840 Spojené státy), Thomas VARDY (826 Velká Británie a Severní Irsko), Jonathan WEIGEL (840 Spojené státy), Dimitris XYGALATAS (300 Řecko) a Cody ROSS (840 Spojené státy)

Vydání

Religion, Brain & Behavior, ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2022, 2153-599X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

60304 Religious studies

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.200

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14210/22:00125647

Organizační jednotka

Filozofická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006291

UT WoS

000778745700004

Klíčová slova anglicky

Supernatural punishment; morality; gods’ minds; cognitive science of religion

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 13. 2. 2023 15:03, Mgr. Ivona Vrzalová

Anotace

V originále

There are compelling reasons to expect that cognitively representing any active, powerful deity motivates cooperative behavior. One mechanism underlying this association could be a cognitive bias toward generally attributing moral concern to anthropomorphic agents. If humans cognitively represent the minds of deities and humans in the same way, and if human agents are generally conceptualized as having moral concern, a broad tendency to attribute moral concern—a “moralization bias”—to supernatural deities follows. Using data from 2,228 individuals in 15 different field sites, we test for the existence of such a bias. We find that people are indeed more likely than chance to indicate that local deities care about punishing theft, murder, and deceit. This effect is stable even after holding beliefs about explicitly moralistic deities constant. Additionally, we take a close look at data collected among Hadza foragers and find two of their deities to be morally interested. There is no evidence to suggest that this effect is due to direct missionary contact. We posit that the “moralization bias of gods’ minds” is part of a widespread but variable religious phenotype, and a candidate mechanism that contributes to the well-recognized association between religion and cooperation.

Citovat

PURZYCKI, Benjamin, Aiyana WILLARD, Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ, Coren APICELLA, Quentin ATKINSON, Alex BOLYANATZ, Emma COHEN, Carla HANDLEY, Joseph HENRICH, Martin LANG, Carolyn LESOGOROL, Sarah MATHEW, Rita MCNAMARA, Cristina MOYA, Ara NORENZAYAN, Caitlyn D PLACEK, Monserrat SOLER, Thomas VARDY, Jonathan WEIGEL, Dimitris XYGALATAS a Cody ROSS. The moralization bias of gods’ minds : a cross-cultural test. Religion, Brain & Behavior. ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2022, roč. 12, 1-2, s. 38-60. ISSN 2153-599X. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006291.

@article{1846561,
   author = {Purzycki, Benjamin and Willard, Aiyana and Kundtová Klocová, Eva and Apicella, Coren and Atkinson, Quentin and Bolyanatz, Alex and Cohen, Emma and Handley, Carla and Henrich, Joseph and Lang, Martin and Lesogorol, Carolyn and Mathew, Sarah and McNamara, Rita and Moya, Cristina and Norenzayan, Ara and Placek, Caitlyn D and Soler, Monserrat and Vardy, Thomas and Weigel, Jonathan and Xygalatas, Dimitris and Ross, Cody},
   article_number = {1-2},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006291},
   keywords = {Supernatural punishment; morality; gods’ minds; cognitive science of religion},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {2153-599X},
   journal = {Religion, Brain & Behavior},
   title = {The moralization bias of gods’ minds : a cross-cultural test},
   url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006291},
   volume = {12},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1846561
AU  - Purzycki, Benjamin - Willard, Aiyana - Kundtová Klocová, Eva - Apicella, Coren - Atkinson, Quentin - Bolyanatz, Alex - Cohen, Emma - Handley, Carla - Henrich, Joseph - Lang, Martin - Lesogorol, Carolyn - Mathew, Sarah - McNamara, Rita - Moya, Cristina - Norenzayan, Ara - Placek, Caitlyn D - Soler, Monserrat - Vardy, Thomas - Weigel, Jonathan - Xygalatas, Dimitris - Ross, Cody
PY  - 2022
TI  - The moralization bias of gods’ minds : a cross-cultural test
JF  - Religion, Brain & Behavior
VL  - 12
IS  - 1-2
SP  - 38-60
EP  - 38-60
PB  - ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
SN  - 2153599X
KW  - Supernatural punishment
KW  - morality
KW  - gods’ minds
KW  - cognitive science of religion
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006291
N2  - There are compelling reasons to expect that cognitively representing any active, powerful deity motivates cooperative behavior. One mechanism underlying this association could be a cognitive bias toward generally attributing moral concern to anthropomorphic agents. If humans cognitively represent the minds of deities and humans in the same way, and if human agents are generally conceptualized as having moral concern, a broad tendency to attribute moral concern—a “moralization bias”—to supernatural deities follows. Using data from 2,228 individuals in 15 different field sites, we test for the existence of such a bias. We find that people are indeed more likely than chance to indicate that local deities care about punishing theft, murder, and deceit. This effect is stable even after holding beliefs about explicitly moralistic deities constant. Additionally, we take a close look at data collected among Hadza foragers and find two of their deities to be morally interested. There is no evidence to suggest that this effect is due to direct missionary contact. We posit that the “moralization bias of gods’ minds” is part of a widespread but variable religious phenotype, and a candidate mechanism that contributes to the well-recognized association between religion and cooperation.
ER  -

PURZYCKI, Benjamin, Aiyana WILLARD, Eva KUNDTOVÁ KLOCOVÁ, Coren APICELLA, Quentin ATKINSON, Alex BOLYANATZ, Emma COHEN, Carla HANDLEY, Joseph HENRICH, Martin LANG, Carolyn LESOGOROL, Sarah MATHEW, Rita MCNAMARA, Cristina MOYA, Ara NORENZAYAN, Caitlyn D PLACEK, Monserrat SOLER, Thomas VARDY, Jonathan WEIGEL, Dimitris XYGALATAS a Cody ROSS. The moralization bias of gods’ minds : a cross-cultural test. \textit{Religion, Brain \&{} Behavior}. ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR \&{} FRANCIS LTD, 2022, roč.~12, 1-2, s.~38-60. ISSN~2153-599X. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2021.2006291.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci