| NASIR, Z. H., D. MERTZ, R. NIEUWLAAT, N. SANTESSO, T. LOTFI, A. MOTILALL, L. MOJA, L. MBUAGBAW, Miloslav KLUGAR, A. F. TURGEON, J. L. MATHEW, C. CANELO-AYBAR, K. POTTIE, O. DEWIDAR, M. W. LANGENDAM, A. IORIO, G. E. VIST, J. J. MEERPOHL, S. FLOTTORP, T. KREDO, T. PIGGOTT, M. MATHEWS, A. QASEEM, D. K. CHU, P. TUGWELL, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, H. NELSON, H. HUSSEIN, J. SUVADA, I. NEUMANN a H. J. SCHÜNEMANN. An evaluation of the eCOVID19 Recommendation Map identified diverging Clinical and Public Health guidance. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. New York: Elsevier, 2022, roč. 147, July 2022, s. 83-94. ISSN 0895-4356. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.008. |
Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@article{1847084,
author = {Nasir, Z. H. and Mertz, D. and Nieuwlaat, R. and Santesso, N. and Lotfi, T. and Motilall, A. and Moja, L. and Mbuagbaw, L. and Klugar, Miloslav and Turgeon, A. F. and Mathew, J. L. and CaneloandAybar, C. and Pottie, K. and Dewidar, O. and Langendam, M. W. and Iorio, A. and Vist, G. E. and Meerpohl, J. J. and Flottorp, S. and Kredo, T. and Piggott, T. and Mathews, M. and Qaseem, A. and Chu, D. K. and Tugwell, P. and Klugarová, Jitka and Nelson, H. and Hussein, H. and Suvada, J. and Neumann, I. and Schünemann, H. J.},
article_location = {New York},
article_number = {July 2022},
doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.008},
keywords = {COVID-19; Divergence; Discordance; GRADE; Guidelines; Recommendations},
language = {eng},
issn = {0895-4356},
journal = {Journal of Clinical Epidemiology},
title = {An evaluation of the eCOVID19 Recommendation Map identified diverging Clinical and Public Health guidance},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435622000695},
volume = {147},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 1847084
AU - Nasir, Z. H. - Mertz, D. - Nieuwlaat, R. - Santesso, N. - Lotfi, T. - Motilall, A. - Moja, L. - Mbuagbaw, L. - Klugar, Miloslav - Turgeon, A. F. - Mathew, J. L. - Canelo-Aybar, C. - Pottie, K. - Dewidar, O. - Langendam, M. W. - Iorio, A. - Vist, G. E. - Meerpohl, J. J. - Flottorp, S. - Kredo, T. - Piggott, T. - Mathews, M. - Qaseem, A. - Chu, D. K. - Tugwell, P. - Klugarová, Jitka - Nelson, H. - Hussein, H. - Suvada, J. - Neumann, I. - Schünemann, H. J.
PY - 2022
TI - An evaluation of the eCOVID19 Recommendation Map identified diverging Clinical and Public Health guidance
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
VL - 147
IS - July 2022
SP - 83-94
EP - 83-94
PB - Elsevier
SN - 08954356
KW - COVID-19
KW - Divergence
KW - Discordance
KW - GRADE
KW - Guidelines
KW - Recommendations
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435622000695
N2 - Objective To describe divergence between actionable statements issued by COVID-19 guideline developers catalogued on the “COVID-19 Recommendations and Gateway to Contextualization” platform. Study Design and Setting We defined divergence as at least two comparable actionable statements with different explicit judgements of strength, direction or subgroup consideration of the population or intervention. We applied content analysis to compare guideline development methods for a sample of diverging statements and to evaluate factors associated with divergence. Results Of the 138 guidelines evaluated, 85 (62%) contained at least one statement that diverged from another guideline. We identified 223 diverging statements in these 85 guidelines. We grouped statements into 66 clusters. Each cluster addressed the same population, intervention, and comparator group or just similar interventions. Clinical practice statements were more likely to diverge in explicit judgment of strength or direction compared to public health statements (Cramer’s V = 0.7, Fisher’s exact test; P <0.001). Statements were more likely to diverge in strength than direction. Date of publication, utilized evidence, interpretation of evidence, and contextualization considerations were associated with divergence. Conclusion More than half of the assessed guidelines issued at least one diverging statement. This study helps understanding the types of differences between guidelines issuing comparable statements and factors associated with their divergence.
ER -
NASIR, Z. H., D. MERTZ, R. NIEUWLAAT, N. SANTESSO, T. LOTFI, A. MOTILALL, L. MOJA, L. MBUAGBAW, Miloslav KLUGAR, A. F. TURGEON, J. L. MATHEW, C. CANELO-AYBAR, K. POTTIE, O. DEWIDAR, M. W. LANGENDAM, A. IORIO, G. E. VIST, J. J. MEERPOHL, S. FLOTTORP, T. KREDO, T. PIGGOTT, M. MATHEWS, A. QASEEM, D. K. CHU, P. TUGWELL, Jitka KLUGAROVÁ, H. NELSON, H. HUSSEIN, J. SUVADA, I. NEUMANN a H. J. SCHÜNEMANN. An evaluation of the eCOVID19 Recommendation Map identified diverging Clinical and Public Health guidance. \textit{Journal of Clinical Epidemiology}. New York: Elsevier, 2022, roč.~147, July 2022, s.~83-94. ISSN~0895-4356. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.008.
|
