J 2023

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

DEWIDAR, O., T. LOTFI, M. W. LANGENDAM, E. PARMELLI, Z. SAZ PARKINSON et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance

Autoři

DEWIDAR, O., T. LOTFI, M. W. LANGENDAM, E. PARMELLI, Z. SAZ PARKINSON, K. SOLO, D. K. CHU, J. L. MATHEW, E. A. AKL, R. BRIGNARDELLO-PETERSEN, R. A. MUSTAFA, L. MOJA, A. IORIO, Y. CHI, C. CANELO-AYBAR, T. KREDO, J. KARPUSHEFF, A. F. TURGEON, P. ALONSO-COELLO, W. WIERCIOCH, A. GERRITSEN, Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Česká republika, domácí), M. X. ROJAS, P. TUGWELL, V. A. WELCH, K. POTTIE, Z. MUNN, R. NIEUWLAAT, N. FORD, A. STEVENS, J. KHABSA, Z. NASIR, G. LEONTIADIS, J. MEERPOHL, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, M. MATTHEWS a H. J. SCHÜNEMANN (garant)

Vydání

BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, London, BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2023, 2515-446X

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30230 Other clinical medicine subjects

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 5.800 v roce 2022

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/23:00129963

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000783805700001

Klíčová slova anglicky

COVID-19; Evidence-Based Practice

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 1. 2024 09:54, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

An evidence-based approach is considered the gold standard for health decision-making. Sometimes, a guideline panel might judge the certainty that the desirable effects of an intervention clearly outweigh its undesirable effects as high, but the body of supportive evidence is indirect. In such cases, the application of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach for grading the strength of recommendations is inappropriate. Instead, the GRADE Working Group has recommended developing ungraded best or good practice statement (GPS) and developed guidance under which circumsances they would be appropriate.Through an evaluation of COVID-1- related recommendations on the eCOVID Recommendation Map (COVID-19.recmap.org), we found that recommendations qualifying a GPS were widespread. However, guideline developers failed to label them as GPS or transparently report justifications for their development. We identified ways to improve and facilitate the operationalisation and implementation of the GRADE guidance for GPS.Herein, we propose a structured process for the development of GPSs that includes applying a sequential order for the GRADE guidance for developing GPS. This operationalisation considers relevant evidence-to-decision criteria when assessing the net consequences of implementing the statement, and reporting information supporting judgments for each criterion. We also propose a standardised table to facilitate the identification of GPS and reporting of their development. This operationalised guidance, if endorsed by guideline developers, may palliate some of the shortcomings identified. Our proposal may also inform future updates of the GRADE guidance for GPS.