2023
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
DEWIDAR, O., T. LOTFI, M. W. LANGENDAM, E. PARMELLI, Z. SAZ PARKINSON et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Good or best practice statements: proposal for the operationalisation and implementation of GRADE guidance
Autoři
DEWIDAR, O., T. LOTFI, M. W. LANGENDAM, E. PARMELLI, Z. SAZ PARKINSON, K. SOLO, D. K. CHU, J. L. MATHEW, E. A. AKL, R. BRIGNARDELLO-PETERSEN, R. A. MUSTAFA, L. MOJA, A. IORIO, Y. CHI, C. CANELO-AYBAR, T. KREDO, J. KARPUSHEFF, A. F. TURGEON, P. ALONSO-COELLO, W. WIERCIOCH, A. GERRITSEN, Miloslav KLUGAR (203 Česká republika, domácí), M. X. ROJAS, P. TUGWELL, V. A. WELCH, K. POTTIE, Z. MUNN, R. NIEUWLAAT, N. FORD, A. STEVENS, J. KHABSA, Z. NASIR, G. LEONTIADIS, J. MEERPOHL, T. PIGGOTT, A. QASEEM, M. MATTHEWS a H. J. SCHÜNEMANN (garant)
Vydání
BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, London, BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2023, 2515-446X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30230 Other clinical medicine subjects
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 5.800 v roce 2022
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/23:00129963
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000783805700001
Klíčová slova anglicky
COVID-19; Evidence-Based Practice
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 26. 1. 2024 09:54, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
An evidence-based approach is considered the gold standard for health decision-making. Sometimes, a guideline panel might judge the certainty that the desirable effects of an intervention clearly outweigh its undesirable effects as high, but the body of supportive evidence is indirect. In such cases, the application of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach for grading the strength of recommendations is inappropriate. Instead, the GRADE Working Group has recommended developing ungraded best or good practice statement (GPS) and developed guidance under which circumsances they would be appropriate.Through an evaluation of COVID-1- related recommendations on the eCOVID Recommendation Map (COVID-19.recmap.org), we found that recommendations qualifying a GPS were widespread. However, guideline developers failed to label them as GPS or transparently report justifications for their development. We identified ways to improve and facilitate the operationalisation and implementation of the GRADE guidance for GPS.Herein, we propose a structured process for the development of GPSs that includes applying a sequential order for the GRADE guidance for developing GPS. This operationalisation considers relevant evidence-to-decision criteria when assessing the net consequences of implementing the statement, and reporting information supporting judgments for each criterion. We also propose a standardised table to facilitate the identification of GPS and reporting of their development. This operationalised guidance, if endorsed by guideline developers, may palliate some of the shortcomings identified. Our proposal may also inform future updates of the GRADE guidance for GPS.