2022
Visegrad Four and EU Differentiated Integration : Activities, Perception and Self-Perception after the Refugee Crisis
KANIOK, Petr, Vratislav HAVLÍK a Veronika ZAPLETALOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Visegrad Four and EU Differentiated Integration : Activities, Perception and Self-Perception after the Refugee Crisis
Autoři
KANIOK, Petr (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Vratislav HAVLÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Veronika ZAPLETALOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí)
Vydání
1st ed. London, The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union, od s. 519-536, 18 s. Routledge International Handbooks, 2022
Nakladatel
Routledge
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50601 Political science
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14230/22:00129062
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta sociálních studií
ISBN
978-0-367-14965-9
Klíčová slova anglicky
EU; Differentiation; Visegrad; Brexit; Migration
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 6. 2. 2023 09:25, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová
Anotace
V originále
There has been a growing discussion on the unity and internal integrity of the EU in recent years. The Visegrad Four group (V4) has played a somewhat ambiguous role in this debate. Looking at the literature and current political events, there seem to be two competing views. Whereas the first view is rather skepticalsceptical about the V4’s ability to have a coherent impact on European integration, the second perceives the V4 as one of the main sources of the current EU’´s problems. This chapter contributes to this discussion by adding a systematic analysis of the V4’s ability to promote a different Europe. It looks not only at the activities of the V4 (and its members), but it also considers the perception of the V4 by its EU partners. Using findings from three case studies – the migration crisis, Brexit and the debate on the future of the EU – it concludes that as activities at the group level are concerned, the V4 as a compact group is a myth. Moving to the perception dimension, the V4 seems to be a more influential “brand” in this regard than it is an active player. But more often than as a compact, four-member group, it appears to be recognized as 2+2 grouping where the first “2” stands for the Czech Republic and Slovakia and the second for Poland and Hungary.
Návaznosti
GA18-05612S, projekt VaV |
|