2022
Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
OSMANCIK, Pavel, Štěpán HAVRÁNEK, Veronika BULKOVÁ, Jan CHOVANČÍK, Tomáš ROUBÍČEK et. al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs with risk factor modification for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial (PRAGUE-25 trial)
Autoři
OSMANCIK, Pavel (203 Česká republika, garant), Štěpán HAVRÁNEK (203 Česká republika), Veronika BULKOVÁ (203 Česká republika), Jan CHOVANČÍK (203 Česká republika), Tomáš ROUBÍČEK (203 Česká republika), Dalibor HEŘMAN (203 Česká republika), Zuzana ČARNÁ (203 Česká republika), Vladimír TUKA, Martin MATOULEK (203 Česká republika), Martin FIALA (203 Česká republika), Otakar JIRAVSKÝ (203 Česká republika), Sylvie STREGL-HRUSKOVA (203 Česká republika), Adam LATIŇÁK (203 Česká republika), Jiřina KOTRYOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jiří JARKOVSKÝ (203 Česká republika)
Vydání
BMJ Open, London, BMJ Publishing Group, 2022, 2044-6055
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30218 General and internal medicine
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 2.900
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/22:00126140
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
000812378000015
Klíčová slova anglicky
Catheter ablation; antiarrhythmic drugs; atrial fibrillation
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 14. 3. 2023 08:17, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF), with a prevalence of 2%, is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation (CA) has been documented to be superior to treatment by antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in terms of sinus rhythm maintenance. However, in obese patients, substantial weight loss was also associated with AF reduction. So far, no study has compared the modern non-invasive (AADs combined with risk factor modification (RFM)) approach with modern invasive (CA) treatment. The aim of the trial is to compare the efficacy of modern invasive (CA) and non-invasive (AADs with risk factor management) treatment of AF. Methods and analysis The trial will be a prospective, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial. Patients with symptomatic AF and a body mass index >30 will be enrolled and randomised to the CA or RFM arm (RFM+AAD) in a 1:1 ratio. In the CA arm, pulmonary vein isolation (in combination with additional lesion sets in non-paroxysmal patients) will be performed. For patients in the RFM+AAD arm, the aim will be a 10% weight loss over 6-12 months, increased physical fitness and a reduction in alcohol consumption. The primary endpoint will be an episode of AF or regular atrial tachycardia lasting >30s. The secondary endpoints include AF burden, clinical endpoints associated with AF reoccurrence, changes in the quality of life assessed using dedicated questionnaires, changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and metabolic endpoints. An AF freedom of 65% in the RFM+AAD and of 60% in the CA is expected; therefore, 202 patients will be enrolled to achieve the non-inferiority with 80% power, 5% one-sided alpha and a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Ethics and dissemination The PRAGUE-25 trial will determine if modern non-invasive AF treatment strategies are non-inferior to CA. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady. Results of the study will be disseminated on scientific conferences and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. After the end of follow-up, data will be available upon request to principal investigator.