J 2022

Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ANTONIOU, V., C. H. DAVOS, E. KAPRELI, Ladislav BAŤALÍK, D.B. PANAGIOTAKOS et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Effectiveness of Home-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation, Using Wearable Sensors, as a Multicomponent, Cutting-Edge Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Autoři

ANTONIOU, V., C. H. DAVOS, E. KAPRELI, Ladislav BAŤALÍK (703 Slovensko, domácí), D.B. PANAGIOTAKOS a G. PEPERA (garant)

Vydání

Journal of Clinical Medicine, Basel, MDPI, 2022, 2077-0383

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

30304 Public and environmental health

Stát vydavatele

Švýcarsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 3.900

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14110/22:00126310

Organizační jednotka

Lékařská fakulta

UT WoS

000824511200001

Klíčová slova anglicky

wearable sensors; home-based cardiac rehabilitation; cardiovascular disease; cardiorespiratory fitness; accelerometer; physical activity

Štítky

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 1. 2023 12:13, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová

Anotace

V originále

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is a highly recommended intervention towards the advancement of the cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients' health profile; though with low participation rates. Although home-based cardiac rehabilitation (HBCR) with the use of wearable sensors is proposed as a feasible alternative rehabilitation model, further investigation is needed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of wearable sensors-assisted HBCR in improving the CVD patients' cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health profile. PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched from 2010 to January 2022, using relevant keywords. A total of 14 randomized controlled trials, written in English, comparing wearable sensors-assisted HBCR to center-based cardiac rehabilitation (CBCR) or usual care (UC), were included. Wearable sensors-assisted HBCR significantly improved CRF when compared to CBCR (Hedges' g = 0.22, 95% CI 0.06, 0.39; I-2 = 0%; p = 0.01), whilst comparison of HBCR to UC revealed a nonsignificant effect (Hedges' g = 0.87, 95% CI -0.87, 1.85; I-2 = 96.41%; p = 0.08). Effects on physical activity, quality of life, depression levels, modification of cardiovascular risk factors/laboratory parameters, and adherence were synthesized narratively. No significant differences were noted. Technology tools are growing fast in the cardiac rehabilitation era and promote exercise-based interventions into a more home-based setting. Wearable-assisted HBCR presents the potential to act as an adjunct or an alternative to CBCR.