Forum Non Conveniens doctrine – post Brexit applicability in
transnational litigation

J 2022

Forum Non Conveniens doctrine – post Brexit applicability in transnational litigation

GRODL, Lukáš

Základní údaje

Originální název

Forum Non Conveniens doctrine – post Brexit applicability in transnational litigation

Autoři

GRODL, Lukáš (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, Brno, Masaryk University, Faculty of Law, 2022, 1210-9126

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Open access časopisu

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/22:00126364

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2022-2-3

Klíčová slova anglicky

Forum non conveniens; jurisdiction; enforcement; recognition; Lugano Convention; Hague Convention 2005; Hague Convention 2019; Brexit

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 3. 4. 2023 10:21, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

The article follows the origin of the English forum non conveniens doctrine development in stay proceedings, its alterations, and applicable tests leading to CJEU’s decision in Owusu. Owusu ultimately forbade English courts to stay its proceedings and allow a “more convenient” forum to decide on the dispute merits in cases where the jurisdiction was conferred by the Brussels regime – not only concerning other EU courts but worldwide. With the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, a question appears whether English courts might again exercise this power. If affirmatory, the paper proceeds to assess various applicable, or presumably fitting, instruments, both for allocation of jurisdiction, and recognition and enforcement of judgments – Lugano Convention, Hague Convention 2005, and Hague Convention 2019. The paper also assesses how these instruments might interact with the use of forum non conveniens doctrine.

Návaznosti

MUNI/IGA/1197/2020, interní kód MU

Název: Secession of the United Kingdom from the European Union and its impact on forum non conveniens doctrine in relation to EU Member States courts

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Secession of the United Kingdom from the European Union and its impact on forum non conveniens doctrine in relation to EU Member States courts

Citovat

GRODL, Lukáš. Forum Non Conveniens doctrine – post Brexit applicability in transnational litigation. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Law, 2022, roč. 30, č. 2, s. 285-303. ISSN 1210-9126. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2022-2-3.

@article{1883517,
   author = {Grodl, Lukáš},
   article_location = {Brno},
   article_number = {2},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2022-2-3},
   keywords = {Forum non conveniens; jurisdiction; enforcement; recognition; Lugano Convention; Hague Convention 2005; Hague Convention 2019; Brexit},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1210-9126},
   journal = {Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi},
   title = {Forum Non Conveniens doctrine – post Brexit applicability in transnational litigation},
   url = {https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/15654/16954},
   volume = {30},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 1883517
AU  - Grodl, Lukáš
PY  - 2022
TI  - Forum Non Conveniens doctrine – post Brexit applicability in transnational litigation
JF  - Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi
VL  - 30
IS  - 2
SP  - 285-303
EP  - 285-303
PB  - Masaryk University, Faculty of Law
SN  - 12109126
KW  - Forum non conveniens
KW  - jurisdiction
KW  - enforcement
KW  - recognition
KW  - Lugano Convention
KW  - Hague Convention 2005
KW  - Hague Convention 2019
KW  - Brexit
UR  - https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/15654/16954
N2  - The article follows the origin of the English forum non conveniens doctrine development in stay proceedings, its alterations, and applicable tests leading to CJEU’s decision in Owusu. Owusu ultimately forbade English courts to stay its proceedings and allow a “more convenient” forum to decide on the dispute merits in cases where the jurisdiction was conferred by the Brussels regime – not only concerning other EU courts but worldwide. With the UK’s withdrawal from the EU, a question appears whether English courts might again exercise this power. If affirmatory, the paper proceeds to assess various applicable, or presumably fitting, instruments, both for allocation of jurisdiction, and recognition and enforcement of judgments – Lugano Convention, Hague Convention 2005, and Hague Convention 2019. The paper also assesses how these instruments might interact with the use of forum non conveniens doctrine.
ER  -

GRODL, Lukáš. Forum Non Conveniens doctrine – post Brexit applicability in transnational litigation. \textit{Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi}. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Law, 2022, roč.~30, č.~2, s.~285-303. ISSN~1210-9126. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CPVP2022-2-3.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci