Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : Two Preregistered
Replications of Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012)

J 2022

Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : Two Preregistered Replications of Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012)

HEREC, Jonáš, Jaroslav SÝKORA, Kamil BRAHMI, David VONDRÁČEK, Oldřiška DOBEŠOVÁ et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : Two Preregistered Replications of Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012)

Autoři

HEREC, Jonáš (203 Česká republika, domácí), Jaroslav SÝKORA (203 Česká republika, domácí), Kamil BRAHMI (203 Česká republika, domácí), David VONDRÁČEK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Oldřiška DOBEŠOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Martin SMĚLÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí), Martin VACULÍK (203 Česká republika, domácí) a Jakub PROCHÁZKA (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí)

Vydání

Cognitive Science, Hoboken, Wiley, 2022, 0364-0213

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50101 Psychology

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Full-text online

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.500

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14230/22:00126407

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13168

UT WoS

000827112100001

Klíčová slova anglicky

Moral judgment; Moral reasoning; Reflection; Argument strength; Replication

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 7. 4. 2024 14:24, prof. PhDr. Martin Vaculík, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

This study consists of two preregistered systematic replications of an experiment on reflection and reasoning in moral judgment by Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012). Czech students read a scenario involving incest between consenting adult siblings and an argument supporting the moral acceptability of the behavior. We manipulated the factors of argument strength (strong vs. weak) and the time that participants had to reflect on the argument (no time vs. 2 min). In the first replication (n = 347), neither the manipulated factors nor their interaction influenced how participants rated the moral acceptability of the incestuous behavior. The only significant predictor in the second replication (n = 717) was argument strength but with a very small effect. The effect of argument strength did not differ across groups either with or without deliberation time. Therefore, neither of the studies replicated the effect that deliberation time moderates the influence of argument strength on moral judgment, even though the samples were considerably larger than in the original study. We thus conclude that the effect of the interaction between the strength of an argument and deliberation time on moral judgment either does not exist or is moderated by certain contextual or sample characteristics.

Návaznosti

MUNI/A/1073/2019, interní kód MU

Název: Behaviorální aspekty organizací (Akronym: BEHORG)

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Behaviorální aspekty organizací, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

MUNI/A/1376/2018, interní kód MU

Název: Faktory ovlivňující pracovní výkon

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Faktory ovlivňující pracovní výkon, DO R. 2020_Kategorie A - Specifický výzkum - Studentské výzkumné projekty

Přiložené soubory

Herec_etal_2022_Reflection_Moral_Judgment_Replications.pdf

Požádat o autorskou verzi souboru

Citovat

HEREC, Jonáš, Jaroslav SÝKORA, Kamil BRAHMI, David VONDRÁČEK, Oldřiška DOBEŠOVÁ, Martin SMĚLÍK, Martin VACULÍK a Jakub PROCHÁZKA. Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : Two Preregistered Replications of Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012). Cognitive Science. Hoboken: Wiley, 2022, roč. 46, č. 7, s. 1-11. ISSN 0364-0213. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13168.

@article{2210957,
   author = {Herec, Jonáš and Sýkora, Jaroslav and Brahmi, Kamil and Vondráček, David and Dobešová, Oldřiška and Smělík, Martin and Vaculík, Martin and Procházka, Jakub},
   article_location = {Hoboken},
   article_number = {7},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13168},
   keywords = {Moral judgment; Moral reasoning; Reflection; Argument strength; Replication},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {0364-0213},
   journal = {Cognitive Science},
   title = {Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : Two Preregistered Replications of Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012)},
   url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cogs.13168},
   volume = {46},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2210957
AU  - Herec, Jonáš - Sýkora, Jaroslav - Brahmi, Kamil - Vondráček, David - Dobešová, Oldřiška - Smělík, Martin - Vaculík, Martin - Procházka, Jakub
PY  - 2022
TI  - Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : Two Preregistered Replications of Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012)
JF  - Cognitive Science
VL  - 46
IS  - 7
SP  - 1-11
EP  - 1-11
PB  - Wiley
SN  - 03640213
KW  - Moral judgment
KW  - Moral reasoning
KW  - Reflection
KW  - Argument strength
KW  - Replication
UR  - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cogs.13168
N2  - This study consists of two preregistered systematic replications of an experiment on reflection and reasoning in moral judgment by Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012). Czech students read a scenario involving incest between consenting adult siblings and an argument supporting the moral acceptability of the behavior. We manipulated the factors of argument strength (strong vs. weak) and the time that participants had to reflect on the argument (no time vs. 2 min). In the first replication (n = 347), neither the manipulated factors nor their interaction influenced how participants rated the moral acceptability of the incestuous behavior. The only significant predictor in the second replication (n = 717) was argument strength but with a very small effect. The effect of argument strength did not differ across groups either with or without deliberation time. Therefore, neither of the studies replicated the effect that deliberation time moderates the influence of argument strength on moral judgment, even though the samples were considerably larger than in the original study. We thus conclude that the effect of the interaction between the strength of an argument and deliberation time on moral judgment either does not exist or is moderated by certain contextual or sample characteristics.
ER  -

HEREC, Jonáš, Jaroslav SÝKORA, Kamil BRAHMI, David VONDRÁČEK, Oldřiška DOBEŠOVÁ, Martin SMĚLÍK, Martin VACULÍK a Jakub PROCHÁZKA. Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment : Two Preregistered Replications of Paxton, Ungar, and Greene (2012). \textit{Cognitive Science}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2022, roč.~46, č.~7, s.~1-11. ISSN~0364-0213. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13168.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci