Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in
phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys

J 2022

Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys

BÜRGER, Jana, Filip KUZMIC, Urban SILC, Florian JANSEN, Erwin BERGMEIER et. al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys

Autoři

BÜRGER, Jana (276 Německo), Filip KUZMIC (705 Slovinsko), Urban SILC (705 Slovinsko), Florian JANSEN (276 Německo), Erwin BERGMEIER, Milan CHYTRÝ (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí), Alicia CIRUJEDA, Silvia FOGLIATTO, Guillaume FRIED, Denise F DOSTATNY, Baerbel GEROWITT, Michael GLEMNITZ, Jose L GONZALEZ-ANDUJAR, Eva Hernandez PLAZA, Jordi IZQUIERDO, Michaela KOLAROVA, Zdeňka LOSOSOVÁ (203 Česká republika, domácí), Helen METCALFE, Jevgenija NECAJEVA, Sandrine PETIT, Gyula PINKE, Valerijus RASOMAVICIUS, Christoph REDWITZ, Matthias SCHUMACHER, Lena ULBER a Francesco VIDOTTO

Vydání

Applied Vegetation Science, Hoboken, Wiley, 2022, 1402-2001

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

10611 Plant sciences, botany

Stát vydavatele

Spojené státy

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

URL

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 2.800

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14310/22:00129142

Organizační jednotka

Přírodovědecká fakulta

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460

UT WoS

000774057700001

Klíčová slova anglicky

agriculture; arable weeds; Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection; European Weed Vegetation database; phytosociology; segetal plants; species richness; vegetation survey; vegetation-plot data; weed survey

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno

Změněno: 3. 1. 2023 21:47, prof. RNDr. Milan Chytrý, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Questions Two scientific disciplines, vegetation science and weed science, study arable weed vegetation, which has seen a strong diversity decrease in Europe over the last decades. We compared two collections of plot-based vegetation records originating from these two disciplines. The aim was to check the suitability of the collections for joint analysis and for addressing research questions from the opposing domains. We asked: are these collections complementary? If so, how can they be used for joint analysis? Location Europe. Methods We compared 13 311 phytosociological releves and 13 328 records from weed science, concerning both data collection properties and the recorded species richness. To deal with bias in the data, we also analysed different subsets (i.e., crops, geographical regions, organic vs conventional fields, center vs edge plots). Results Records from vegetation science have an average species number of 19.0 +/- 10.4. Metadata on survey methodology or agronomic practices are rare in this collection. Records from weed science have an average species number of 8.5 +/- 6.4. They are accompanied by extensive methodological information. Vegetation science records and the weed science records taken at field edges or from organic fields have similar species numbers. The collections cover different parts of Europe but the results are consistent in six geographical subsets and the overall data set. The difference in species numbers may be caused by differences in methodology between the disciplines, i.e., plot positioning within fields, plot sizes, or survey timing. Conclusion This comparison of arable weed data that were originally sampled with a different purpose represents a new effort in connecting research between vegetation scientists and weed scientists. Both collections show different aspects of weed vegetation, which means the joint use of the data is valuable as it can contribute to a more complete picture of weed species diversity in European arable landscapes.

Návaznosti

GX19-28491X, projekt VaV

Název: Centrum pro evropské vegetační syntézy (CEVS) (Akronym: CEVS)

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Centrum pro evropské vegetační syntézy (CEVS)

Citovat

BÜRGER, Jana, Filip KUZMIC, Urban SILC, Florian JANSEN, Erwin BERGMEIER, Milan CHYTRÝ, Alicia CIRUJEDA, Silvia FOGLIATTO, Guillaume FRIED, Denise F DOSTATNY, Baerbel GEROWITT, Michael GLEMNITZ, Jose L GONZALEZ-ANDUJAR, Eva Hernandez PLAZA, Jordi IZQUIERDO, Michaela KOLAROVA, Zdeňka LOSOSOVÁ, Helen METCALFE, Jevgenija NECAJEVA, Sandrine PETIT, Gyula PINKE, Valerijus RASOMAVICIUS, Christoph REDWITZ, Matthias SCHUMACHER, Lena ULBER a Francesco VIDOTTO. Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys. Applied Vegetation Science. Hoboken: Wiley, 2022, roč. 25, č. 1, s. "e12460", 13 s. ISSN 1402-2001. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460.

@article{2214017,
   author = {Bürger, Jana and Kuzmic, Filip and Silc, Urban and Jansen, Florian and Bergmeier, Erwin and Chytrý, Milan and Cirujeda, Alicia and Fogliatto, Silvia and Fried, Guillaume and Dostatny, Denise F and Gerowitt, Baerbel and Glemnitz, Michael and GonzalezandAndujar, Jose L and Plaza, Eva Hernandez and Izquierdo, Jordi and Kolarova, Michaela and Lososová, Zdeňka and Metcalfe, Helen and Necajeva, Jevgenija and Petit, Sandrine and Pinke, Gyula and Rasomavicius, Valerijus and Redwitz, Christoph and Schumacher, Matthias and Ulber, Lena and Vidotto, Francesco},
   article_location = {Hoboken},
   article_number = {1},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460},
   keywords = {agriculture; arable weeds; Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection; European Weed Vegetation database; phytosociology; segetal plants; species richness; vegetation survey; vegetation-plot data; weed survey},
   language = {eng},
   issn = {1402-2001},
   journal = {Applied Vegetation Science},
   title = {Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys},
   url = {https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460},
   volume = {25},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - JOUR
ID  - 2214017
AU  - Bürger, Jana - Kuzmic, Filip - Silc, Urban - Jansen, Florian - Bergmeier, Erwin - Chytrý, Milan - Cirujeda, Alicia - Fogliatto, Silvia - Fried, Guillaume - Dostatny, Denise F - Gerowitt, Baerbel - Glemnitz, Michael - Gonzalez-Andujar, Jose L - Plaza, Eva Hernandez - Izquierdo, Jordi - Kolarova, Michaela - Lososová, Zdeňka - Metcalfe, Helen - Necajeva, Jevgenija - Petit, Sandrine - Pinke, Gyula - Rasomavicius, Valerijus - Redwitz, Christoph - Schumacher, Matthias - Ulber, Lena - Vidotto, Francesco
PY  - 2022
TI  - Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys
JF  - Applied Vegetation Science
VL  - 25
IS  - 1
SP  - "e12460"
EP  - "e12460"
PB  - Wiley
SN  - 14022001
KW  - agriculture
KW  - arable weeds
KW  - Arable Weeds and Management in Europe data collection
KW  - European Weed Vegetation database
KW  - phytosociology
KW  - segetal plants
KW  - species richness
KW  - vegetation survey
KW  - vegetation-plot data
KW  - weed survey
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460
N2  - Questions Two scientific disciplines, vegetation science and weed science, study arable weed vegetation, which has seen a strong diversity decrease in Europe over the last decades. We compared two collections of plot-based vegetation records originating from these two disciplines. The aim was to check the suitability of the collections for joint analysis and for addressing research questions from the opposing domains. We asked: are these collections complementary? If so, how can they be used for joint analysis? Location Europe. Methods We compared 13 311 phytosociological releves and 13 328 records from weed science, concerning both data collection properties and the recorded species richness. To deal with bias in the data, we also analysed different subsets (i.e., crops, geographical regions, organic vs conventional fields, center vs edge plots). Results Records from vegetation science have an average species number of 19.0 +/- 10.4. Metadata on survey methodology or agronomic practices are rare in this collection. Records from weed science have an average species number of 8.5 +/- 6.4. They are accompanied by extensive methodological information. Vegetation science records and the weed science records taken at field edges or from organic fields have similar species numbers. The collections cover different parts of Europe but the results are consistent in six geographical subsets and the overall data set. The difference in species numbers may be caused by differences in methodology between the disciplines, i.e., plot positioning within fields, plot sizes, or survey timing. Conclusion This comparison of arable weed data that were originally sampled with a different purpose represents a new effort in connecting research between vegetation scientists and weed scientists. Both collections show different aspects of weed vegetation, which means the joint use of the data is valuable as it can contribute to a more complete picture of weed species diversity in European arable landscapes.
ER  -

BÜRGER, Jana, Filip KUZMIC, Urban SILC, Florian JANSEN, Erwin BERGMEIER, Milan CHYTRÝ, Alicia CIRUJEDA, Silvia FOGLIATTO, Guillaume FRIED, Denise F DOSTATNY, Baerbel GEROWITT, Michael GLEMNITZ, Jose L GONZALEZ-ANDUJAR, Eva Hernandez PLAZA, Jordi IZQUIERDO, Michaela KOLAROVA, Zdeňka LOSOSOVÁ, Helen METCALFE, Jevgenija NECAJEVA, Sandrine PETIT, Gyula PINKE, Valerijus RASOMAVICIUS, Christoph REDWITZ, Matthias SCHUMACHER, Lena ULBER a Francesco VIDOTTO. Two sides of one medal: Arable weed vegetation of Europe in phytosociological data compared to agronomical weed surveys. \textit{Applied Vegetation Science}. Hoboken: Wiley, 2022, roč.~25, č.~1, s.~''e12460'', 13 s. ISSN~1402-2001. Dostupné z: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12460.

Podrobný výpis o publikaci